Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Balbir Singh v. Ghaziabad Development Authority

    Heard the applicant who appears in person and the learned counsel for the respondent. The prayers in the Compensation Application were for compensation on account of failure to deliver the possession of the Apartment. The prayer was also made that apart from the compensation a direction should be given for delivery of possession. The prayer for direction to deliver the possession cannot be entertained in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Ved Prakash Aggarwal . in Civil Appeal No. 794 of 2001. However, there is substance in another plea. In any event, the applicant is entitled to refund of the amount with interest. The respondent is directed to refund the amount along with interest @7.5% per annum from the date of deposit of the installments till the amount actually paid. The payment shall be made within a period of two months. The application is disposed of.

    [Dr. Arijit Pasayat]

    Chairman

    [Rahul Sarin]

    Member

    [Pravin Tripathi]

    Member

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Balbir Singh v. Ghaziabad Development Authority
    (Mar 4, 2010)