AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25, Mumbai v. M/S. Saroj Sales Organization

    1. It is common ground before us that the substantial questions of law framed in these Appeals are identical and/or similar to the questions framed in Income Tax Appeal No. 201 of 2012 and Income Tax Appeal No. 308 of 2012, which have been decided by us today. In view of our judgment in Income Tax Appeal No. 201 of 2012 with Income Tax Appeal No. 308 of 2012 and for the reasons stated therein, we answer the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals in favour of the Assessees and against the Revenue. The appeals are disposed off in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25, Mumbai v. M/S. Saroj Sales Organization
    (Sep 19, 2014)