AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The present interim order arises from civil appeals challenging the Bombay High Court judgment in “Cricket Association of Bihar v. Board of Control for Cricket in India” (2013) 5 AIR Bom R 598. In the underlying public-interest litigation, the Cricket Association of Bihar alleged extensive betting and spot-fixing during the 2013 Indian Premier League (IPL), implicating Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan (then described as Team Principal of Chennai Super Kings) and a part-owner of Rajasthan Royals. Chennai Super Kings is owned by India Cements Ltd., whose Managing Director, Mr. N. Srinivasan, simultaneously served as President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and is the father-in-law of Mr. Meiyappan.

The Supreme Court heard the appeals in part, fixed 16-04-2014 for further hearing, and recognised that judgment would follow only after additional days of argument. Meanwhile, the 2014 IPL season was scheduled to commence on the same date, necessitating immediate interim directions to preserve the integrity of the tournament.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether Mr. N. Srinivasan should be removed, even at the interim stage, from the office of BCCI President in light of the betting and spot-fixing allegations and the findings of the Court-appointed IPL Probe Committee.
  2. What interim administrative structure should govern BCCI affairs related to IPL 2014 so that public confidence in the tournament is maintained pending final adjudication of the appeals.

Arguments of the Parties

Submissions on behalf of Mr. N. Srinivasan

  • Through counsel, Mr. Srinivasan offered in writing not to discharge any functions of BCCI President until completion of the investigation into the allegations against him.

Cricket Association of Bihar’s Arguments

  • No further investigation is necessary; the findings of the Court-appointed IPL Probe Committee, together with its supporting material, suffice for the Court to remove Mr. Srinivasan from the BCCI presidency forthwith.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Cricket Association of Bihar v. Board of Control for Cricket in India, (2013) 5 AIR Bom R 598 (Bombay High Court) Not expressly cited for any legal principle; referenced as the judgment under appeal. Provided the procedural backdrop and subject matter for the present civil appeals.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court acknowledged it had yet to hear all parties fully and therefore refrained from forming any opinion on the ultimate relief—namely, the permanent removal of Mr. Srinivasan. However, the imminent start of IPL 2014 required protective interim measures to ensure the tournament proceeded in accordance with IPL rules and maintained public trust.

Given Mr. Srinivasan’s voluntary step-aside offer, and the need for an independent figurehead, the Court considered the credentials of Mr. Sunil Gavaskar—an internationally renowned former cricketer and former national captain—as uniquely suited to command confidence. Consequently, the Court:

  • Appointed Mr. Gavaskar to exercise the powers of BCCI President solely in relation to IPL 2014.
  • Directed that, in all other BCCI matters, the senior-most Vice-President, Mr. Shiv Lal Yadav, would act as President.
  • Ordered that employees of India Cements Ltd. or its associates (save for players or commentators) should not perform BCCI duties during this interim period, while empowering Mr. Gavaskar to engage personnel of his choice.
  • Authorised Mr. Gavaskar to decide whether Mr. Sundar Raman, the Chief IPL Operating Officer, should continue in that role, and allowed Mr. Gavaskar to apply to the Court for further directions in case of difficulty.
  • Prohibited Mr. Gavaskar from working as a commentator during his interim presidency and directed BCCI to compensate him for resulting loss of income, with the quantum to be settled after hearings resume.

The Court emphasised that no player or team was barred from participating in IPL 2014.

Holding and Implications

INTERIM ORDER: Mr. Sunil Gavaskar is appointed Interim President of BCCI for all IPL 2014 matters; Mr. Shiv Lal Yadav will discharge presidential functions for all other BCCI business. Additional operational directions regarding staff engagement, broadcast commentary by Mr. Gavaskar, and the role of the Chief IPL Operator are issued. The appeals are listed for further hearing on 16-04-2014.

Implications: The order safeguards the credibility of IPL 2014 by temporarily distancing BCCI governance from individuals linked to the betting allegations, while avoiding disruption to teams or players. It creates no final precedent on removal of office-bearers; the substantive issues remain open for adjudication after full hearing.

    Board Of Control For Cricket In India v. Cricket Association Of Bihar And Others

    Order

    1. Leave granted. These two civil appeals arise out of Cricket Assn. of Bihar v. Board of Control for Cricket in India (2013) 5 AIR Bom R 598 filed in the Bombay High Court by the Cricket Association of Bihar. In the PIL before the Bombay High Court, serious allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL 2013 have been made against Mr Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team Principal of Chennai Super Kings and also allegations of betting have been made against the part-team owner of IPL franchisee — Rajasthan Royals.

    2. The team owner of Chennai Super Kings is India Cements Ltd. of which Mr N. Srinivasan, the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (for short “BCCI”), is the Managing Director and Mr Gurunath Meiyappan is the son-in-law of Mr N. Srinivasan.

    3. We have heard these matters in part and posted these matters for further hearing to 16-4-2014 and it will take some more days after 16-4-2014 for hearing to be completed and for judgment to be delivered.

    4. Mr N. Srinivasan, the President of BCCI, has made a written offer through his counsel that till the investigation into the allegations against him is completed he will not discharge any of the functions of the President of BCCI.

    5. Mr Harish N. Salve, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Cricket Association of Bihar, however, submitted that no further investigation into the allegations against Mr Srinivasan is necessary as the findings of the IPL Probe Committee appointed by this Court and the materials relied on by the said Committee for the findings are sufficient for this Court to remove Mr Srinivasan from the post of the President of BCCI as prayed in the PIL filed before the Bombay High Court.

    6. As we are yet to hear all the parties in these matters, we cannot at this stage form any opinion and pass orders on the basis of such opinion for removal of Mr Srinivasan from the post of the President of BCCI.

    7. IPL 2014 is, however, scheduled to commence on 16-4-2014 and we have to pass interim orders to ensure that all those who love cricket continue to watch cricket in IPL 2014 and the matches are played by the players in accordance with the IPL Rules.

    8. Considering the fact that Mr Sunil Gavaskar was a cricket player of great repute and eminence, a captain of the Indian cricket team for a long period and has a wide experience in cricket related activities and of men and matters, we appoint him, as an interim measure, to function as and exercise the powers of the President of BCCI in relation to IPL 2014 till we hear and deliver the judgment in these matters. We make it clear that with regard to all other matters of BCCI, the seniormost Vice-President of BCCI, Mr Shiv Lal Yadav, will discharge the functions of the President of BCCI.

    9. We also direct that till we deliver the judgment, none of the employees of India Cement Ltd. or its associate companies (except cricket players or commentators) will perform any of the duties assigned to them by BCCI and the interim President, Mr Sunil Gavaskar, will have power to engage the services of such persons on whom he has confidence for work in connection with IPL 2014.

    10. We also direct that it is for Mr Gavaskar to decide as to whether Mr Sundar Raman, Chief IPL Operator would continue in IPL 2014 or some other arrangement has to be made in his place. In case of any difficulty, Mr Gavaskar may apply to this Court for appropriate orders.

    11. Mr Gavaskar will not work as a commentator during this period as an interim President of BCCI in relation to IPL matters and he will be adequately compensated for his loss of income for this period by BCCI. The compensation amount will be determined after the Court resumes hearing on 16-4-2014.

    12. We make it clear that we have not passed any order preventing any player or any team from participating in the IPL Tournament 2014. List for further hearing on 16-4-2014 on the top of the Board.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Board Of Control For Cricket In India v. Cricket Association Of Bihar And Others
    (Mar 28, 2014)