AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Y.S Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau Of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch .

    Order

    SLP (Crl.) No. 5902 of 2012

    1. Heard Mr Gopal Subramanium, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner at some length.

    2. Mr Mohan Parasaran, learned ASG appearing on behalf of CBI, submitted before us a report from which it appears that the investigation is still going on in connection with seven matters. In Para 9 of the report it is stated as under:

    “… The matters which are pending investigation also involved investigation into various serious economic offences involving hundreds of crores of rupees. The major matters which are now under investigation relate to conspiracies distinctly involving the following entities which by themselves are independent of each other and are therefore distinct conspiracies:
    (i) Sandur Power Co. Ltd.
    (ii) Grant of mining lease to Bharti Cements/Raghuram Cements which are companies none other than the own companies of A-1, Mr JMR.
    (iii) Penna Cements and Group Companies.
    (iv) Dalmia Cements.
    (v) India Cements.
    (vi) Investment through paper companies based in Kolkata and Mumbai, popularly known as suitcase companies.
    (vii) Indu Projects.
    (viii) Lepakshi knowledge Hub.
    The amounts involved and which are subject-matter of investigation in the above cases as per estimates exceed Rs 3000 crores.”
    (emphasis in original)

    3. Mr Parasaran stated that CBI is making investigation without wasting any time and he assured the Court that the investigation will be completed as early as possible and on completion of the investigation CBI shall submit one final charge-sheet.

    4. On hearing the counsel for the parties and on going through the report submitted by CBI, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

    5. It will be, however, open to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail before the trial court on completion of the investigation by CBI on the issues as indicated above and submission of the final charge-sheet. In case, such a prayer is made, the court shall consider the prayer for bail independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by the dismissal of the special leave petition.

    SLP (Crl.) No. 5946 of 2012

    6. Put up after two weeks.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Y.S Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau Of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch .
    (Oct 5, 2012)