Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Army Act, Section 162
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Army Act, Section 162

    L/Naik Mahabir Singh v. Chief Of Army Staff .

    Order

    1. Heard counsel for the petitioner. This petition is barred by limitation and no application for condonation of delay has been made. We have, however, accepted the oral prayer of the counsel to condone the delay and have proceeded to hear the matter on merits.

    2. Of the several submissions made, only one aspect deserves to be noticed. There was a summary court martial in which the petitioner was found guilty and was sentenced to six months' imprisonment and dismissed from service. The abstract of the proceeding produced as Annexure II to the petition shows that the proceedings were subject to review under the Army Act, Section 162. Counsel makes grievance that such review has not been done. We do not propose to issue notice but in case the decision of the summary court martial is subject to review, the authorities shall exercise jurisdiction of review and pass appropriate orders or directions. In case review is not admissible, no further action will be taken. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the Army Headquarters at New Delhi for compliance to the extent indicated above. Special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    L/Naik Mahabir Singh v. Chief Of Army Staff .
    (Oct 19, 1987)