Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Nandagopal Saha v. Union Of India .

    Order

    We are afraid we have to allow the petition on the sole ground that copies of vital documents were not furnished to the detenu and thereby he was denied a fair opportunity of making a representation. We consider that the statement of Mrs Jhunu Rani Saha, the statement of the petitioner dated February 19, 1986 and the documents which accompanied handwriting expert's opinion were vital to enable the detenu to make a proper representation. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. The writ petition is allowed accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Nandagopal Saha v. Union Of India .
    (Mar 24, 1987)