AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Jahangir Ansari Alias Jehangir Ansari v. The State Of Jharkhand

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI

    B.A. No. 418 of 2016 Jahangir Ansari @ Jehangir Ansari, son of Roushan Ansari, Resident of Village :- Gorakhpur, P.O. & P.S. :- Lalmatiya, District :- Godda.

    ..... Petitioner(s) Versus

    The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party(s)

    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD

    For the Petitioner(s) : M/s Manoj Kr. Sah Vivek Kumar, Advocates.

    For the State : M/s Amresh Kumar, APP -----

    02/09.02.2016. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

    learned counsel for the State.

    The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under

    Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code

    read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

    Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner and 7 others have been alleged to have resorted to

    firing causing injuries to Abaul Ansari, Mohibul Ansari and Md.

    Sirajuddin Ansari, but injuries have been found to be simple in

    nature whereas accused Haider Ansari, Feroz Ansari and Sahwan

    Ansari have been alleged to have fired shot upon Salim Ansari as

    a result of which he died and that the petitioner has never been

    alleged to have fired shot upon Salim Ansari rather the petitioner

    has been alleged to have fired shot along with 7 others causing

    injuries to the aforesaid persons and that Shahban Ansari as well

    as Firoz Ansari have been admitted to bail and under the

    circumstances, the petitioner also deserves to be admitted on

    bail.

    Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the

    case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on

    bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

    sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

    District & Addl. Sessions Judge-III, Godda, in connection with S.T.

    No.2 of 2011 /17 of 2011.

    (R. R. Prasad, J.)

    Sandeep/

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Jahangir Ansari Alias Jehangir Ansari v. The State Of Jharkhand
    (Feb 9, 2016)