Loading..
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
Smart Summary

Structured Summary of the Opinion — CWPIL No. 16 of 2014 (High Court of Himachal Pradesh)

Factual and Procedural Background

This writ petition public interest litigation (CWPIL No. 16 of 2014) originated from a suo motu notice taken by the High Court after a news item published in the Hindi daily Amar Ujjala (9th November, 2014 edition) reporting illegal use of the drug Oxytocin on fruits, vegetables and milching animals. The caption lists the State of Himachal Pradesh and others as respondents. The Court heard assistance from Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate, acting as Amicus Curiae, and received affidavits from official respondents addressing the issue.

The Court recorded that it took notice on 24.11.2014 and the judgment was reserved on 24.2.2016, with the date of decision being 15.3.2016. The petition culminated in directions issued to various authorities (both Central and State) to curb the clandestine manufacture, distribution and misuse of Oxytocin and related regulatory and enforcement measures.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether there is rampant misuse of Oxytocin in Himachal Pradesh (and more widely) in the dairy, agriculture and horticulture sectors such that state and central authorities must take further regulatory and enforcement action.
  2. Whether the existing regulatory framework and administrative measures (including decisions of DCC/DTAB and notifications issued by the Central Government) are adequate to prevent clandestine manufacture, diversion and misuse of Oxytocin.
  3. What remedial directions (if any) should be issued to the respondents to strengthen detection, surveillance, inter-state coordination, testing facilities and prosecution to curb misuse of Oxytocin.
  4. Whether measures short of prohibition (e.g., enhanced surveillance, recording supply, restricting supply channels, capacity building) are appropriate given Oxytocin's recognised therapeutic uses.

Arguments of the Parties

Amicus Curiae (Mr. Satyen Vaidya) — Key Points

  • There is rampant and extensive misuse of Oxytocin not only in dairy but also in agriculture and horticulture sectors across the State and country.
  • Official statistics (affidavits of respondents) reveal extremely limited sampling and analysis — only 117 food samples taken in three years in the State and only 65 samples analyzed — indicating inadequate enforcement and surveillance.
  • The sole State Common Testing Laboratory (CTL) at Kandaghat lacks the facility to detect Oxytocin in food samples, rendering submission of samples to that lab ineffective.
  • The respondents' claim of strict vigil is contradicted by the low number of seizures (one recorded seizure of 254 veterinary-use Oxytocin injections in three years) and the apparent clandestine supply chains.
  • Misuse is widespread and produces adverse effects on animal health and potentially serious public health implications when contaminated milk, vegetables and fruits enter the food chain.

Respondents' Position (as reflected in affidavits and official minutes)

  • The respondents did not dispute that misuse has been reported and discussed at the Drugs Consultative Committee (DCC) and Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) meetings.
  • The respondents placed on record minutes and recommendations from the DCC and DTAB (various meetings described), which acknowledge misuse and recommend steps such as restricting supply of bulk drug to licensed manufacturers, sale of veterinary formulations to veterinary hospitals only, increased surveillance, and raids on clandestine manufacture.
  • Central Government issued notifications (e.g., G.S.R. 29(E) dated 17.1.2014 and an October 22, 2014 communication) incorporating DTAB/DCC recommendations, including recording of retail supply details and curbing illegal movement and supply.
  • DTAB deliberated that Oxytocin has legitimate therapeutic uses and therefore could not be completely prohibited; instead, the focus should be on controlled distribution and stronger enforcement.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court proceeded in a logical sequence grounded in the material before it:

  1. Identification of the problem: The Court took initial notice of press reports alleging illegal and widespread use of Oxytocin on food items and milching animals, and considered affidavits placed on record which described the drug, its therapeutic uses and its potential harms when misused.
  2. Assessment of evidence and official response: The Court examined the respondents' affidavits and official minutes of DCC and DTAB meetings. Those documents acknowledged the misuse, recorded that illicit manufacture and clandestine channels exist, and contained recommendations to curb diversion of bulk drug and restrict sale channels.
  3. Evaluation of enforcement adequacy: The Court focused on concrete enforcement indicators — number of samples lifted and tested in the State over three years (117 samples lifted, 65 analyzed), the inadequacy of testing facilities at the Kandaghat CTL (admitted by respondent No. 5), and the very limited seizures. These facts led the Court to conclude that existing measures were insufficient.
  4. Weighing therapeutic necessity against public harm: While DTAB and others recognised Oxytocin's legitimate medical uses (for induction/augmentation of labour, control of postpartum bleeding, etc.) and therefore recommended against a blanket prohibition, they nonetheless recommended strict controls on manufacture, distribution and sale. The Court adopted this reasoning: it declined to order an absolute prohibition but found stronger regulatory and enforcement intervention necessary.
  5. Formulation of remedial measures: Based on the admitted extent of misuse, the official recommendations and the inadequacy of current enforcement, the Court crafted targeted directions to both Central and State authorities. These directions were designed to strengthen the drug regulatory system, improve laboratory detection capacity, enhance surveillance and inter-agency coordination, require transparency in licensing and production, and empower law enforcement to prevent interstate smuggling and clandestine manufacture.
  6. Emphasis on systemic solutions: The Court emphasized the need for (a) capacity building (an Academy for training regulatory officers), (b) operational testing facilities at the State CTL, (c) a Special Task Force in each district, (d) regular publication of license and production/sales data, (e) deployment of police at inter-state borders, (f) records and inspections of wholesalers/retailers, and (g) steps under Food Safety and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for prosecution where appropriate.
  7. Final procedural disposition: After setting out the directions, the Court disposed of the petition and any pending applications.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The Court issued specific remedial directions to the respondents and concluded the petition. In terms used in the order, the petition was disposed of after issuing those directions:
DISPOSED OF

Immediate consequences and operative implications:

  • The respondents are required to strengthen the drug regulatory system at Central and State levels for better coordination in regulating manufacture, import and distribution of Oxytocin.
  • The Union of India is directed to establish, within three months, an Academy for training drug regulatory officers (both enforcement and laboratory personnel) as envisaged in DCC minutes.
  • The State Government must ensure adequate testing facilities for Oxytocin at the Kandaghat Laboratory within three months and fill vacancies so the laboratory functions with qualified personnel.
  • The State must examine all existing manufacturers' licences for compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and publish monthly details of licences and monthly production/sales figures on its website.
  • Each State district must constitute a Special Task Force to prevent availability of prohibited or regulated drugs in the open market other than in prescribed manners.
  • Wholesalers and retailers must maintain legally required records and submit them for quarterly inspection.
  • States must deploy sufficient police personnel at inter-state borders to check vehicles and prevent entry of contraband drugs.
  • Respondent No. 1 is to consider restricting manufacture of Oxytocin to public sector companies or otherwise limit manufacture to already licensed entities.
  • Food Safety authorities must conduct random sampling of milk and vegetables and prosecute where Oxytocin is detected; police are to book offenders under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act where applicable.
  • Respondents No. 1 and 2 must undertake public sensitization through print, audio and visual campaigns about the misuse and ill effects of Oxytocin.

The opinion does not purport to create a general legal precedent beyond the directions issued. Its immediate effect is to require the respondents to implement the listed regulatory, enforcement and capacity-building measures; the Court disposed of the petition after issuing those directions.

Disposition

The petition is disposed of and all pending applications (if any) are closed, subject to compliance with the directions set out above.

Source: Extracted and summarized exclusively from the provided judgment text of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh (CWPIL No. 16 of 2014), decided 15th March 2016. No external materials or inferences beyond the text were used.

    Court On Its Own Motion Petitioner v. State Of H.P. & Ors. S

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

    CWPIL No. 16 of 2014 .

    Judgment reserved on: 24.2.201 . 6 P Date of Decision : 15.3.2016. Court on its own motion. … PHetitioner. Versus f

    State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. _______________________________ t __ __o_____________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M u anso r or Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge . Whether approved fo o r reporting? Yes.

    For the petitio ne C r: Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate, as Amicus Curiae with Mr. Vivek h

    Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate g

    General, with Mr. Anup Rattan, i

    Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J. K. H

    Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 5, 8 and 9. Mr.Ashok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India with Mr.Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 7 and 8.

    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge

    "As long as greed is stronger than compassion, there will always be suffering". Rusty Eric. This is precisely what is revealed in the instant case. On 24.11.2014, this Court took notice of a news item published in daily Hindi vernacular Amar Ujjala in its 9thNovember, 2014

    1

    2

    edition, wherein the illegal use of lethal vaccine 'Oxytocin' in fruits, vegetables and on milching animals was highlighted. .

    2. What is Oxytocin has been lucidly explaine . d P in the affidavit of respondent No. 1, wherein it is stated th H at Oxytocin was originally extracted from animal posterior pi f tuitaries and is now chemically synthesized. Its only use is o in obstetrics, where it is employed to stimulate uterine r con t traction to induce or reinforce labour or to promote ejection of breast milk. Oxytocin causes milk ejection by contracting o the m u yoepithelial cells around the mammary alveoli. Although toxicities are uncommon when the drug is used

    properly; hyp ert C ensive crises, uterine rupture, water retention, and fetal de h ath have been reported. Oxytocin is contraindicated in abn g ormal fetal presentation, fetal distress and premature births. O i xytocin for human use is available in injections as also by way of

    H nasal solution. 3. Mr. Satyan Vaidya, learned Senior Advocate and Amicus Curiae is at pains to point out that there is rampant and extensive misuse of Oxytocin, not only in the dairy sector, but also

    in the agriculture and horticulture sector and the State Authorities,

    as also the Central Authorities entrusted with the task of preventing

    the misuse of Oxytocin have completely failed to check and curb

    this menace.

    4. In order to buttress his submission, learned Amicus Curiae has relied upon the statistics reflected in the affidavits filed

    3

    by the official respondents themselves as the basis of his arguments. Apparently, in the last three years, only eleve.n samples of fruits, four samples of vegetables, eleven sa . m P ples of non-vegetarian food items and ninety one sam ple H s of milk were lifted in the entire State of Himachal Pradesh. f Meaning thereby that over the last three years, in all only 117 o samples of food articles

    were lifted, out of which only 65 s r am t ple s had been analyzed, which means that only one sample per ten days was lifted in the entire State. u

    5. It is furthe o r pointed out by the learned Amicus Curiae that the sole C Government Common Testing Laboratory (CTL) Kandagh h at, District Solan does not even have the facility for det g ection of Oxytocin in food samples, as has been admitted by r i espondent No. 5 in his affidavit and if that be so, then there is no

    H purpose of sending the food articles to CTL Kandaghat and the action of the respondents in doing so is merely an eye wash. 6. It is also pointed out that respondents in their replies have been conspicuously silent about the possibility of the drug

    Oxytocin being illegally imported in the State of Himachal Pradesh

    from other parts of the country or even overseas and their

    assertion that strict vigil and check is being maintained falls flat on

    the ground as during the last three years, there was only one

    seizure, wherein 254 injections of Oxytocin (for veterinary use)

    4

    were seized. This inaction clearly reflects the casual approach of the authorities to such a serious issue. .

    7. The learned Amicus Curiae has painstakingly . pla P ced on record additional material, wherein it is pointed out H that the misuse of drug Oxytocin is rampant and wide sp f re ad and is being indiscriminately used in most parts of o the country on milching animals, vegetables, fruits and non t -ve getarian consumable items by unscrupulous people wit u h the r motive to earn more profits at the cost of serious consequences on the animals as well as human health. A few of the o dangers and hazards, beside many others

    have been su mm C arized as follows:- h "(a) Its usage predisposes the new born baby to jaundice and reduces the supply of blood to its brain.

    ig

    (b) Diary owners use the Oxytocin injection twice a day injecting it into the cow-buffaloes to make the milk flow faster by H

    causing the animal's uterus to start contracting putting the animal in enormous pain. (c) The drug makes the animal barren within three years and also lowers its life span. The cow-buffalo is inseminated within 24 hours of calving by the dairy owners and then the animal, without any respite, has to undergo the agony and pain of

    maltreatment with the drug of Oxytocin.

    (d) The Oxytocin not only effects the cow/buffalo, it filters into the milk and consequently, has been held responsible for breast and uterine cancers, male impotence, excessive hair on woman and balding for men, early or erratic periods, early development of breasts (in both sexes). Its use is also considered harmful eyes, especially in children. The hormone affects the reproductive ability of woman. Its most common symptoms are exhaustion and loss of energy. Consumption of Oxytocin infected milk by pregnant woman increases risk of hemorrhage.

    5

    It is also responsible for high spike in tuberculosis cases . in humans.

    (e) Beef all over India has been found to be extremely toxic with large amount of this drug. P

    (f) The direct infusion of this drug in vegetables., fruits and other consumables for humans is also wide sp H read making such food items highly infected with Oxytocin."

    8. At this stage we may notice t o hat u

    fnder Section 5 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (f t or short the "Act"), the Central Government is required to const r itute the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (for short DTAB), u whose duty is to advice the Central

    Government and Sta o te Government on technical matters arising

    out of the ad m C inistration of the Act and to carry out the other functions h assigned to it by the Act. 9. g

    Similarly, under Section 7 of the Act, the Central G i overnment may constitute an advisory committee to be called

    H Drugs Consultative Committee (for short DCC) and its duties is to advise the Central Government, State Government and DTAB on any matter tending to secure uniformity throughout India in the administration of the Act.

    10. The respondents in their response have not disputed the misuse of Oxytocin. Rather in the affidavit filed by respondent No. 2, it is clearly pointed out that in the 44thmeeting of DCC, held on 20.7.2012, the issue of misuse of Oxytocin injection by dairy owners to extract milk from milch animals and its harmful effects were discussed and the following recommendations were made:-

    6

    "The members felt that the misuse of oxytocin is rampant in many of the States and reports of its clandestine manufactu . re and sale appear now and then in the press. The Drug is available as unlabelled or wrongly labelled packs. Man P y of the States like UP, Delhi have taken action in seizures o.f stocks on the basis of intelligence gathered. As the manufacture and sale of these products is through clandestin f e c haHnnels, it becomes difficult to stop their misuse o except through continuous surveillance. After deliberation s it was opined that as the bulk drug (oxytocin) is being ma t nufactured in a few States only, the diversion of the bulk r drug to the illegal channels could be curtailed to a large u extent if it is ensured that the bulk drug is sold to the licensed manufacturer only."

    11. The matte o r was again considered in the 46thDCC meeting held on 12-13 November, 2013 and the following recomm h endat ion

    Cs were made:

    "The members felt that the illicit manufacture of Oxytocin

    ig

    injection for the use of extracting milk from milch animals by the diary owners is a clandestine activity. The manufacture of the H

    drug for diary owners etc. takes places in the regions where drug control administration is lax and then the drug is transported to other States clandestinely. It is available in unlabelled or wrongly labelled packs. Even though many of the States have taken action on the basis of intelligence gathered through surveillance. However, strong measures are required to restrict

    the supply of oxytocin injection for veterinary use and also

    ensured that diversion of the bulk drug to illegal channels is

    curtailed."

    12. In the 65thmeeting of DTAB, a statutory body under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (for short the Act of 1940), the issue of continued misuse of Oxytocin injections by the dairy owners for extracting milk from milch animals and its harmful effects on the health of cows and buffaloes as well as on the

    7

    consumers was again discussed and the silent features of the discussion emerged as under:- .

    "The drug Oxytocin has medical use for inducti P on and augmentation of labour, to control post par H tum ble.eding and uterine hypo tonicity. The alleged abundan t availability and use of the drug in a clandestine way, howe f ver, is a matter of great concern for public health. The s o ale of the Oxytocin injection is regulated under Schedule H of the Rules, which requires the drug to be dispensed on the t pre scription of a Registered Medical Practitioner only. Fu r rther, to avoid its bulk sale, Oxytocin injection is required to be packed in single unit blister pack only."

    13. The issue o of p u rohibiting the drug also came up for consideration, but after detailed deliberations the members of DTAB agreed t C hat as the drug has a definite use for therapeutic purpose h s, it need not to be prohibited. However, the DTAB agreed w i ith g the suggestion that the manufacturers of bulk drug should supply active pharmaceutical drug only to the manufacturers

    H licensed for manufacture of formulations and the formulations meant for veterinary use are sold to the veterinary hospitals only. The DTAB further recommended that the State Drug Controllers may be asked to curb the misuse of the drug through increased

    surveillance and raids conducted on the possible hideouts of

    clandestine manufacture and sale of this drug and take strict action

    against the offenders.

    14. It was on the basis of the aforesaid recommendations of the DTAB that the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare issued

    8

    G.S.R. 29(E) dated 17.1.2014, restricting the manufacture and sale of Oxytocin as under: .

    "The manufacturers of bulk Oxytocin drug shall su P pply the active pharmaceutical drug only to the manu H facture.rs licensed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 194 5 for manufacture of formulations of the said drug. The formulations meant for veteri f nary use shall be sold to

    the veterinary hospitals only."

    o

    15. It was also came in the t a ffidavit of respondent No. 2 that at one time concerns u were r raised and the Government was requested to have co o mplete ban on circulation/marketing of this drug except in r C egistered hospitals and for this a special meeting of DTAB was convened on 1 st April, 2014. The DTAB again delibera h ted the matter in depth and the members were of the view t i ha g t the drug is already a prescription drug and can be sold only under the prescription of a Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP).

    H The drug as such had a definite role in the medical field both for humans and animals and the legitimate manufacture and sale of the drugs would not, therefore, be stopped. Moreover, keeping in view the medical emergency in rural or remote areas, the drug

    could only be obtained from the sale outlets and its sale could not,

    therefore, be restricted to the registered hospitals.

    16. However, even in this meeting, it was acknowledged that there was rampant and wide spread misuse of the drug for the milking purposes and was required to be stopped. The suggestions then mooted and put forth for preventing the misuse of

    9

    Oxytocin was by way of enhanced surveillance by the regulatory authorities, strict action against the violators, sensitizing th.e general public by launching campaigns through print a . nd P audio visual media and the local police could also boo H k the offenders under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, f 19 60 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, which do no t p o ermit the sale of the drug except under proper prescription. t

    17. It was further u recom r mended that a new clause be added to the already o issued notification stating that the supply of the Oxytocin shall be recorded by the retail chemist at the time of supply giving th C e name and address of the prescriber, name of the

    patient h and the quantity supplied. Such records would be ma g intained for three years and shall be open for inspection. This w i ould help in not only maintaining the legitimate supply of the drug

    H but also to curb misuse of the drug through legitimate sale channels. 18. It was pursuant to the aforesaid recommendations that notification G.S.R. 29(E) dated 17.1.2014, restricting the

    manufacture and sale of Oxytocin was issued and reads thus:-

    "The manufacturers of bulk Oxytocin drug shall supply the active pharmaceutical drug only to the manufacturers licensed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 for manufacture of formulations of the said drug."

    The formulations meant for veterinary use shall be sold to the veterinary hospitals only.

    The supply of the Oxytocin formulations for human use by the retail chemist shall be recorded at the time of supply giving

    10

    the name and address of the presciber, name of the patient and the quantity supplied. Such records shall be maintained for thre . e years and be open for inspection."

    19. Further, in order to curb the misuse of . OxPytocin, especially by the dairy owners, a notification was H issued by the Central Government on 22.10.2014. The rele f va nt portion whereof reads thus: o

    "Strict regulatory cont r rol t ove r the manufacture, sale and distribution of Oxytocin and measures required to be taken to curb the misuse o u f Oxytocin by dairy owners for milking milch animals. In o order to take stringent measures on all cases of misuse of Oxytocin by the State Drug Control Authority in their State C s/UT and a constant vigil needs to be kept on the illegal mo vement of the Oxytocin. Investigate the source of the illegal supply of the Oxytocin sold to dairy owners. The help from the h NGOs in the States/UT could be taken to locate the areas where g

    such illegal sale is being done. In this connection, the State i

    Drugs Controllers are requested to provide the details of the manufacturers of bulk and formulations of Oxytocin in their State

    H

    along with the statistical information on the seizures conducted, quantity seized along with its value persons arrested, prosecutions filed, samples taken, reports of sub-standard quality received during the last three years to the office DCG (I) within 30 days of receipt of this letter."

    20. It would be noticed that inspite of various provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and other statutes in place, this Court cannot be oblivious to the fact that there is large scale manufacture and sale of drugs carried out in clandestine manner and that there is grave misuse of Oxytocin by farmers and dairy owners, which is the matter of great concern. This clandestine activity of manufacture and sale of the drug to the farmers or dairy owners

    11

    requires constant surveillance and interstate coordination and the violators are required to be dealt with heavy hand. It is not only th.e health of the animals, especially milch animals, which is . m P atter of concern, but a greater concern lies in the fact that it H is this very milk and vegetables which have been injected with f Ox ytocin to increase its size, that is being consumed by all of u o s.

    21. The above narration o t f facts do indicate that the respondents have though u initia r ted steps to check and curb the misuse of Oxytocin, o but yet the same cannot be termed to be sufficient and therefore, taking into consideration the entirety of the facts and ci rcu C mstances, we proceed to pass the following direction h s:- g (i) The respondents shall bring about an efficient Drug i

    Regulatory System both at the Centre and the State for H

    better co-ordination and handling of the entire problem so as to regulate the manufacture, import and distribution, especially, those drugs like Oxytocin. For efficient administration, these authorities are directed to work with effective co-ordination among themselves, so

    that there is uniformity of approach amongst different

    stakeholders.

    (ii) The Union of India will establish within three months an Academy for training all drug regulatory officers both from Enforcement and Laboratory set up as decided, in principle, in the 49thmeeting of DCC held on 16th October, 2015.

    (iii) The State Government shall make available adequate testing facilities of Oxytocin at its Kandaghat Laboratory

    12

    within a period of three months and the respondent- State shall further ensure that all vacancies and pos . ts in the said Laboratory are made functional by appointing duly qualified personnel(s) w . ithPin the aforesaid period.

    H

    (iv) The State Government will hencef orth examine the licences of all the existing manu f factures of drugs to ensure that the same t ha ve o been issued strictly in accordance with the r Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules.

    (v) The State Go u vernment through its Drug Controller (under the o Drugs and Cosmetics Act) shall place on its web C site by 10 th of each month the details of the lic ences issued to the various manufacturers alongwith h monthly statement of production and sales with g

    complete particulars and details made by the i

    manufacturers. The manufacturers of the drugs shall in turn submit these details in advance so as to reach the

    H

    Office of the Drug Controller by 7 th day of every month.

    (vi) The respondent-State shall within three months constitute a Special Task Force in each district, whose duty shall be to ensure that no drug which is either

    prohibited or regulated is readily available in the open

    market, save and except, in the manner prescribed.

    (vii) The wholesalers and retailers of all prohibited scheduled drugs shall maintain records as required under the law and the same shall be produced for inspection after every quarter before the Officer specially appointed for this purpose by the Drug Controller.

    13

    (viii) The State Government will ensure the deployment of sufficient police personnel (atleast four) at all its Inte . r- State Borders so as to ensure that no pro . hibited or contraband drugs enter into the State and fPor this purpose it shall be incumbent upon these officials to

    check all vehicles viz. taxis, private vHehicles, official

    vehicles, public transport vehicles e f tc.

    (ix) Respondent No. 1 is further o directed to consider the feasibility of restrict r ing t th e manufacture of Oxytocin only in public se u ctor companies and also restricting and limiting the manufacture of Oxytocin by companies to whom licen o ses have already been granted. (x) The C competent authorities under the Food Safety and St andards Act, 2006 are directed to ensure random h sampling of milk and vegetables and carryout g

    prosecutions where such products tests positive for i

    Oxytocin. H

    (xi) The police authorities are directed to book all the offenders under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 who are found using Oxytocin, more particularly in milching animals.

    (xii) Respondents No. 1 and 2 are directed to sensitize the general public about the misuse and abuse of drugs and its ill effects by launching campaigns through print, audio, video modes etc.

    22. With these observations, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.

    Before parting, we place on record our appreciation and gratitude for the valuable assistance rendered by Mr.Satyen

    14

    Vaidya, Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae, Mr. Sharwan Dogra, learned Advocate General and Mr.Ashok Sharma, P learne.d Assistant Solicitor General of India to this Court.

    .

    (Mansoor A H hmad Mir) C f hie f Justice. (Ta o rlok Singh Chauhan), 15th March, 2016 Judge.

    (KRS)

    ur

    t

    Co ig

    h

    H

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Court On Its Own Motion Petitioner v. State Of H.P. & Ors. S
    (Mar 15, 2016)