Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

    Bipin Behary Daw v. Sreedam Chunder Dey

    1. I think the question is inadmissible. I do not think the statement of the father as to the date of the son's birth is evidence. illustration (1) to section 32 would be material in cases of pedigree; but the rule which admits hearsay evidence in pedigree cases is confined to the proof of the pedigree, and does not apply to proof of the facts which constitute a pedigree, such as birth, death and marriage, when they have to be proved for other purposes. See Haines v. Guthrie L.B. 13 Q.B.D. 818.

    2. This question does not come under para. 5 of section 32 or any other paragraph of that section.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Bipin Behary Daw v. Sreedam Chunder Dey
    (May 25, 1886)