Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

    Patcha Saheb v. Sub Collector Of North Arcot

    1. The petition of appeal was presented on 11th June in the recess, and the stamp was received and affixed on the 25th. The Court opened on 27th June.

    2. Following the principle laid down in Skinner v. Orde L.R., 6 I.A., 126 we must hold that the petition must be regarded as an appeal from the date on which it was presented and not from the date on which the stamp was received. The decree of the District Court must be reversed and the appeal remanded. The appellant is entitled to the costs of this appeal, and the cost in the lower Appellate Court will abide and follow the result.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Patcha Saheb v. Sub Collector Of North Arcot
    (Aug 24, 1891)