Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

    Ramasami v. Muttusami And Anr.

    1. The District Judge found the plaintiff's case was established the averment in the plaint being that the loan was made on 30th September 1885 and was repayable in one month from that date. The plaint was presented on 24th October 1888. There was also evidence to support the finding of the Judge.

    2. Even, therefore, if the admisssion contained in the will does not amount to an acknowledgment, the suit is not barred. We agree with the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Rameshwar Mandal v. Ram Chand Roy I.L.R., 10 Cal., 1033, that such a suit will fall under Article 115 [Article 115:

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Description of suit. | Period of | Time from which period begins to run.

    | limitation. | ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ For compensation for the breach | Three years ... | When the contract is broken, or of any contract, expess or implied, | | (where there are successive breaches) not in writing regstered and not | | when the breach in repect which herein specially provided for. | | the suit is instituted occurs, or (where | | the breach is continuing) when it | | ceases.] ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ of the Limitation Act and not under Article 57.

    [Article 57:

    _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ For money payable for money | Theree years... | When the loang is made.] lent. | | _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    3. The decree of the learned Judge must, therefore, be reversed and that of the District Judge restored, but as this point was not taken before we shall make no order as to costs in this Court. The plaintiff is entitled to other costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ramasami v. Muttusami And Anr.
    (Sep 24, 1891)