Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Queen-Empress v. Ram Sundar And Another

    Edge, C.J and Blennerhassett, J.:— The offence of kidnapping for which Ram Sundar and Musammat Anupa have been committed for trial took place in Nepal. The charge was inquired into by a Magistrate in British India, and the commitment for an offence under s. 363 of the Indian Penal Code was made, but no certificate of the Political Agent in Nepal, which is required by the provisions of s. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a condition precedent to the hearing of the charge in British India, was produced or is shown to have been issued. The proviso to s. 188 is prohibitive, and under the circumstances, we hold that the Magistrate had no jurisdiction. We quash the commitment.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Queen-Empress v. Ram Sundar And Another
    (Jul 30, 1896)