Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Din Dayal (Decree-Holder) v. Patrakhan (Judgment-Debtor).

    Sir John Edge, C.J and Knox, Blair, Banerji and Aikman, JJ.:— This is an appeal from the order of a Subordinate Judge passed in an appeal from an order of a Munsif on an objection filed to an application for execution of a decree. The suit was one of the nature cognizable by a Court of Small Causes, and the value of the subject-matter did not exceed Rs. 500. It has been held by this Court in Harakh v. Ram Sarup that s. 586 of the Code of Civil Procedure bars such an appeal in such a case. The same view of the law was taken by the Calcutta Court in Sri Bullov Bhattacharji v. Baburam Chattopadhya and by the Madras Court in Aithala v. Subbanna. We accordingly dismiss this appeal with costs.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Din Dayal (Decree-Holder) v. Patrakhan (Judgment-Debtor).
    (Jul 21, 1896)