AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The matter arises from earlier directions issued by the Court concerning the effective functioning of the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) and proper storage of food-grains. Pursuant to those directions, Smt. Alka Sirohi, Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, filed a comprehensive affidavit addressing the Court’s queries. The affidavit, handed over through the learned Additional Solicitor General, outlines current allocations under the TPDS, initiatives for computerisation, and difficulties in large-scale implementation across all States and Union Territories. The Court recorded these submissions, invited responses from the petitioner, dealer associations, and State Governments, and issued further directions regarding computerisation, storage infrastructure, and distribution of food-grains.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the facilities of the Public Distribution System should continue for the Above Poverty Line (APL) population after allocations to Antyodaya Anna Yojana and Below Poverty Line (BPL) categories are met.
  2. Whether complete computerisation of the TPDS—from Food Corporation of India (FCI) godowns to the ultimate beneficiary—should be mandated to curb pilferage and corruption, including development of common software and possible integration with the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).
  3. What long-term and short-term measures the Union of India must adopt to prevent wastage of record food-grain stocks and to ensure adequate storage facilities nationwide.
  4. Whether State Governments are distributing the Union of India’s allocation of 35 kg of wheat/rice per family to beneficiaries as required.

Arguments of the Parties

Union of India (through affidavit and Additional Solicitor General)

  • After meeting Antyodaya and BPL requirements, remaining food-grains are allocated to States/UTs for distribution to APL households, addressing the Court’s query on continuation of APL benefits.
  • A policy for computerisation of TPDS was approved in August 2009, with pilot projects in Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Chandigarh, and Haryana. Integrated Information System for Food-grains Management (IISFM) has been developed by NIC for FCI operations.
  • Implementation of Information and Communication Technology solutions nationwide is complex due to varying practices and e-readiness across 35 States/UTs, 600+ districts, and over 5 lakh fair price shops.
  • A task force headed by the Director General, NIC, constituted on 9-8-2010, will integrate existing projects and explore leveraging UIDAI.
  • The Union of India agrees in principle to complete computerisation of the entire public distribution chain and seeks six weeks to submit a comprehensive report.

Petitioner

  • Contends that although the Union of India allocates 35 kg of wheat/rice per family, State Governments are not distributing the grains in the same proportion to beneficiaries.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court acknowledged the Union’s comprehensive affidavit as a substantial response to its earlier queries. It noted the Union’s agreement to fully computerise the TPDS to enhance transparency and reduce corruption and pilferage, stressing the urgency of a nationwide system that tracks movement of food-grains from FCI godowns to end beneficiaries. The Court pressed for expeditious action, directing the Union to submit a detailed report within six weeks and authorising it to seek assistance from any appropriate agency.

Recognising the record procurement of wheat and rice—604.28 lakh tonnes as of 1-6-2010—and the resulting storage constraints, the Court emphasised the Government’s responsibility to ensure food security. It urged long-term solutions such as constructing at least one large FCI godown in every State, ideally extending to each division, and short-term measures including: (a) increasing food supply to BPL populations; (b) keeping fair price shops open all 30 days of the month; and (c) distributing food-grains to deserving populations at minimal or no cost. The Court also highlighted the need to strengthen the public distribution system in tribal and drought-prone areas.

In response to the petitioner’s allegation that States were not distributing the full 35 kg allocation, the Court directed State Governments to file affidavits addressing this issue within one week, thereby ensuring accountability at the State level.

Holding and Implications

INTERIM DIRECTIONS ISSUED; MATTER LISTED FOR FURTHER DIRECTIONS ON 31-08-2010.

Immediate implications include: (i) the Union of India must expedite and report on complete TPDS computerisation within six weeks; (ii) States must file affidavits confirming distribution of the full 35 kg allocation; (iii) parties are to complete pleadings before the next hearing. The decision sets no new legal precedent but reinforces administrative accountability for food-grain storage, distribution, and system transparency.

    People'S Union For Civil Liberties v. Union Of India And Others

    Order

    1. In pursuance of the directions of this Court, Smt Alka Sirohi, Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, New Delhi has filed a comprehensive affidavit, a copy of which was handed over to us by the learned Additional Solicitor General in Court, which is taken on record. A serious endeavour has been made to give a clear answer to all the queries raised by us in our last order. The learned counsel for the petitioner, the Dealer's Associations and the State Governments may file reply to this affidavit within a week from today.

    2. In reply to the Court's query why the facilities of the public distribution system be not discontinued for people who are above poverty line, a comprehensive reply has been filed in which it is mentioned that after meeting the total allocation of the population in the categories of Antyodaya Anna Yojana and below poverty line, the remaining foodgrains are allocated to the States and the Union Territories for distribution to the above poverty line population. That is precisely what the Court had in mind when the previous order was passed.

    3. It is also indicated in the affidavit that the Union of India is making allocation to the States @ 35 kg per family. In reply to the Court's query that to avoid pilferage and corruption there must be total computerisation of public distribution system on a priority basis. The Court also observed that the Union of India must prepare a common software for all the States. It was also indicated in the previous order that the Union of India may consider computerisation in consultation with the specialised agencies like the Unique Identification Authority of India or any other agencies. In reply to that, it is mentioned that the Department of Food and Public Distribution has taken up several initiatives for computerisation of targeted public distribution system (for short “TPDS”).

    4. A policy scheme of computerisation of TPDS has been approved in August 2009 to be implemented in three districts in each of the four pilot States i.e Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh and Delhi and piloting of foodgrain bag tracking in one district in Chhattisgarh. A pilot scheme on smart card based delivery of TPDS commodities has also been approved for the Union Territory of Chandigarh and Haryana. Integrated Information System for Foodgrains Management (Iisfm) is an application developed by the National Informatics Centre for Food Corporation of India (FCI). The project aims at putting an online management system in place to give information about foodgrains management in FCI at any point of time.

    5. In the affidavit it is also indicated that implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) solutions across the country on a large scale covering 35 States/UTs, more than 600 districts, their sub-divisions/block/tehsil level godowns and over 5 lakh fair price shops across a diverse operating environment is quite complex. The processes and practices, skill sets and e-readiness vary from State to State and even from district to district within a State. It is also mentioned in the affidavit that the Department of Information Technology, National Informatics Centre and Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai) and other experts, a task force headed by Director General, National Informatics Centre has been set up on 9-8-2010 which will include representatives of the Department of Information and Technology, Uidai, Department of Food and Public Distribution, Food Corporation of India and Food Secretaries of selected States/UTs as members. The task force is entrusted with the responsibility of working out the modalities for integration of the existing projects and also to suggest as to how Uidai will be eventually leveraged.

    6. The Union of India, in principle, has agreed to the complete computerisation of the entire public distribution system which means computerisation from the godown of Food Corporation of India to the ultimate beneficiary to ensure greater transparency of the entire public distribution system. Mr Parasan, learned Additional Solicitor General prays for some time to submit a comprehensive report in this regard. Looking to the urgency of this matter, we request the Union of India to expedite the whole process and submit a comprehensive report to this Court as early as possible and in any event within six weeks from today. The Union of India may take the help and assistance of any organisation or agency which it may deem appropriate.

    7. The Food Secretary in her affidavit has stated that there has been record procurement of wheat and rice in the last three years as a result of which the central pool stocks reached the level of 604.28 lakh tonnes on 1-6-2010. Due to high procurement of wheat and rice during the last three years and insufficient covered storage space available in the country to store the procured stock, 178 lakh tonnes of wheat was stored in covered and plinth (CAP) storage, as on 1-6-2010. CAP storage involves storage on elevated plinths with polythene covers specially made for this purpose.

    8. The Union of India must ensure food security of the country. In view of record procurement which the Government of India is not able to properly store and preserve, it would be appropriate that the Government of India may take some long-term and short-term measures to solve the problem. Permanent solution lies in constructing adequate storage facilities. The Union of India may consider constructing at least one large Food Corporation of India godown in every State and consider the possibility of construction of one godown in every division if not in every district of the State.

    9. Similarly, the Government of India may consider taking some short-term measures to deal with this problem of foodgrains which are rotting:

    (a) increase in the quantum of food supply to the population below poverty line;
    (b) opening the fair price shops for all the 30 days in a month; and
    (c) distribute foodgrains to the deserving population at a very low cost or no cost.

    10. The public distribution system needs to be strengthened particularly, in the tribal and drought-prone areas of the country.

    11. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the Union of India has allocated 35 kg of wheat/rice per family but the State Governments are not distributing it in the same proportion. We would like the State Governments to file affidavits in that respect within one week.

    12. Pleadings be completed in all the applications on board today before the next date of hearing. Reply to the affidavit of the Union of India, if any, may be filed within a week. Rejoinder may be filed within a week thereafter.

    13. List this petition for further direction on 31-8-2010.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    People'S Union For Civil Liberties v. Union Of India And Others
    (Aug 12, 2010)