Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Leila David (1) v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

    Order

    1. Exemption from filing OT is granted. Petitioners, M/s Leila David and Ms Annette Kotian are present in this Court. Some of the allegations made in these petitions as well as in supporting affidavit appear prima facie to be per se contempt of this Court.

    2. The petitioners were asked to withdraw the allegations, but they refused to do so and submitted that they stand by these averments and strongly urged that this Court should issue process to arrest the twelve Judges of the High Court of Bombay.

    3. In view of the obstinate stand taken by these petitioners, there is no other way, but to issue notice to them as to why contempt proceedings shall not be issued against them. Reply, if any, be filed by the petitioners on or before 10-9-2008.

    4. Place the matters before an appropriate Bench presided over by Hon'ble Arijit Pasayat, J.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Leila David (1) v. State Of Maharashtra And Others
    (Aug 29, 2008)