AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Besta Electronics Private Limited And Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another

    Rule nisi issued. Heard counsel for the parties. In view of the principles laid down by this Court in H. Anuaj v. Government of Tamil Nadu [1986] 61 STC 165; (1986) 1 SCC 414, Indian Cement Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh [1988] 69 STC 305; (1988) 1 SCC 743, Weston Electroniks v. State of Gujarat [1988] 70 STC 62; (1988) 2 SCC 571 and West Bengal Hosiery Association v. State of Bihar [1988] 71 STC 298; (1988) 2 Scale 280, and having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, we quash the Notification No. A-3-22-86-(83)-ST-V dated December 11, 1986. All concerned parties will pay tax at the uniform higher rate. In view of the facts and the circumstances of the case and in view of this order the past transactions will not be affected.

    The writ petition is disposed of as above.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Besta Electronics Private Limited And Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another
    (Sep 16, 1988)