Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 10A of the Divorce Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act
  • Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 10A of the Divorce Act
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion addresses the question whether the mandatory waiting period following the filing of a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act, and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act can be waived either suo motu by the court or upon the application of both parties. The court consolidated several such petitions for hearing. The specific case involved parties who are Christians, married on 18/9/04, living separately since 7/6/09, and who filed a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent in December 2009 under Section 10A of the Divorce Act. The application was dismissed by the impugned order, and the petitioners sought to set aside that order and dispense with the statutory waiting period.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the statutory waiting period after filing a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act, and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act can be waived by the court suo motu or on the application of both parties.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court referred to its earlier decision in Matrimonial Appeal No. 633/08, where it summarized the mandatory conditions that must co-exist before a court can exercise its power to grant a decree of divorce by mutual consent under the relevant statutory provisions. These conditions include the solemnization of marriage, mutual agreement to dissolve the marriage, a specified period of separation prior to filing, inability to live together during that period, and the mandatory waiting period of not less than six months and not more than eighteen months after filing the joint petition before the second motion for dissolution is made.

Applying this legal framework to the facts, the court found that the petitioners’ request to dispense with the six-month waiting period under Section 10A of the Divorce Act lacked merit and was therefore dismissed.

The court further observed that personal presence of the parties at the time of filing and during the second motion need not be insisted upon rigidly. Counsel may appear on behalf of the parties, and affidavits may suffice as evidence of the genuineness of the application. The court emphasized that ritualistic insistence on personal presence for conciliation or counselling is unnecessary if the court is otherwise satisfied about the bona fides of the joint petition.

Holding and Implications

The petition to waive the mandatory waiting period under Section 10A of the Divorce Act was dismissed.

The direct effect of this decision is that the statutory waiting period for a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under the relevant laws cannot be dispensed with by the court either suo motu or on application of the parties. The ruling reinforces the mandatory nature of the waiting period as a statutory safeguard and clarifies procedural flexibility regarding the personal presence of parties, without setting any new precedent beyond these points.

    Saji T. Varghese & Anr. v. State Of Kerala

    R. Basant, J.:— Can the waiting period after filing the joint petition for divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Indian Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act be waived by the court suo motu or on the application of both parties?

    2. This question arose for consideration in various petitions and we posted all such cases together for hearing. Sri. G. Shrikumar, Advocate, has rendered assistance as amicus curiae for the court.

    3. We have had the advantage of hearing Advocates M/s. S. Subash Chand, Sandhya Raju, M.R Rajesh, R. Sunilkumar, Soby K. Francis and others on the question.

    4. We have answered that question in Mat. Appeal No. 633/08 today. The finding on that question is extracted below:

    “We may, in these circumstances summarise the law and state that not only conditions A, B, C and D below; but condition E below also are mandatory requirements that must all co-exist before the court's power under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10A of the Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act to pass the decree for dissolution on the basis of a joint application for divorce on mutual consent is invoked:

    A. Solemnisation of marriage.

    B. The mutual agreement of the spouses that the marriage should be dissolved.

    C. That the spouses have been living separately for the specified period of one year/two years prior to the presentation of the application. D. They have not been able to live together during this period; and E. Minimum period of six months and maximum period of 18 months has elapsed from the date on which the application for divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 10A of the Divorce Act is filed and the spouses have made the second motion for dissolution thereafter.”

    5. Having so understood the law, we look at the facts in this case. The parties are Christians. They both employed abroad. Their marriage was solemnized on 18/9/04. They started separate residence with effect from 7/6/09. In December, 2009 they applied for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 10A of the Divorce Act. That application stands dismissed by the impugned order - Ext.P3 The petitioners pray that the impugned order may be set aside and the period of waiting may be dispensed with.

    6. In the light of the law that we have already ascertained, which we have extracted above, the prayer to dispense with the period of six months under Section 10A of the Divorce Act is found to be without any merit. This petition is accordingly dismissed.

    7. We may hasten to observe that the personal presence of such applicants/spouses in the application for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent need not be unnecessarily insisted by the court. It is submitted that the parties find it difficult to personally appear after the period of waiting. After the period of waiting, a second motion need onlybe made and personal presence of the spouses need not be insisted. The learned counsel can make such second motion on their behalf. Their presence need not also be insisted to tender evidence. Ordinarily chief affidavits can be filed by them to state their case on oath. Hence the personal presence of the parties need not ordinarily be insisted. In the instant case, conciliation has already taken place, it is submitted. Even otherwise, ritualistic insistence on personal presence of the parties for conciliation/counselling need not be made by a court in a joint application for divorce on the ground of mutual consent, if the court is otherwise satisfied about the genuineness of the application.

    8. Petition dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Saji T. Varghese & Anr. v. State Of Kerala
    (Feb 22, 2010)