Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Kulasekara Naicker v. Jagadambal Ammal

    Wallis, C.J:— Accepting the interpretation put upon the word ‘judgment’ in clause (15) of the Letters Patent in Tuljaram Row v. Alagappa Chettiar, the most recent decision on the subject of a Full Bench of this Court, we think that an order as to costs is not the less a judgment within the meaning of clause (15) of the Letters Patent because it relates to costs only. We do not think that the observations of White, C.J, in the later case, Numberumal Chettiar v. Krishnajee, are opposed to this view. The earlier decision of the Full Bench in Saravana Mudaliar v. Rajagopala Chetty(3) was binding on the Bench in that case and the learned Chief Justice merely distinguished it by showing that it was inapplicable to the facts of that case. We answer the question in the affirmative.

    K.R

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kulasekara Naicker v. Jagadambal Ammal
    (Feb 18, 1919)