Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    M.V Sundaresa Ayyar For Himself And As Official Receiver Of The Estate Of Pakala Venkata Rao . (S 1 And 4). v. Pacala Subba Rao And Others S In Both (Petitioners).

    The Subordinate Judge has restored an application to restore a suit after that application was itself time-barred. He seems to have thought that when the defendant had acquired the right by operation of the law of limitation to claim that the litigation against him should cease, the Court has an inherent power to deprive the defendant of that right, and to order the litigation to proceed.

    Obviously S. 151 never confers any such power upon a Court—a power for the ends of injustice and to promote abuse of the process of the Court. The defendant after the plaintiff has exhausted his statutory limit of time clearly has justice on his side and the Court has no right to interfere in order to override a lawful bar of limitation.

    The Petition is allowed with costs throughout and the lower Court's order is cancelled.

    This disposes of the appeal.

    N.R.R Petition allowed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    M.V Sundaresa Ayyar ... v. Pacala Subba Rao And...
    (Sep 5, 1932)