Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 84 (2) of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act II
  • Order XLIII, Rule 1, clause. (c),
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 84 (2) of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act II
  • Order XLIII, Rule 1, clause. (c),

    Srinivasa Ayyar Alias Srinivasa Ayyangar (Petitioner). v. The Board Of Commissioners For The Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras And Others S (S).

    1. A decision by the District Judge under Section 84 (2) of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act II of 1927 has been held to be not appealable under a recent Full Bench decision of our High Court in Appeal No. 574 of 1931 given on April 11, 1933: Rajagopala Chettiar v. Hiridu. Religious Endowments Board, Madras 147 Ind. Cas. 614 : 6 R.M. 362 : (1933) M.W.N. 1385 : 66 M.L.J. 43 : 39 L.W. 4 : A.I.R. 1931 Mad. 103 (F.B.) This is an appeal against an order refusing to set aside the dismissal of the application under the aforesaid s. 84 for default. According to Order XLIII, Rule 1, clause. (c), an appeal would lie against such an order only in a case open to appeal.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Srinivasa Ayyar Alia... v. The Board Of Commiss...
    (Nov 15, 1933)