AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Nagoor Kanhi Nadura Petitioner (Complainant). v. Sithu Naick And Others S (Accused 1 To 3).

    This case is not of much actual importance and this Court will not ordinarily interfere to set aside acquittals in petty assaults. But it raises a point of law of some interest. Can an appellate Court in order to test the substance of the evidence forming part of the judgment in a case under Sect. 264, Criminal Procedure Code, call for such material as may exist outside the record, such as notes of evidence taken by the Presidency Magistrate as in the present case? Considering that Sect. 264, Criminal Procedure Code clearly lays down that the judgment shall be the only record in such cases, it must be held that such additional matter cannot be called for or consulted. The appellate Court therefore has based its decision upon irrelevant matter; but in the present case there is no reason to interfere.

    The petition is dismissed.

    C. K.Petition dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Nagoor Kanhi Nadura Petitioner (Complainant). v. Sithu Naick And Others S (Accused 1 To 3).
    (Sep 10, 1926)