Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Acts
  • Court; Section 526, Criminal Procedure Code.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Acts
  • Court; Section 526, Criminal Procedure Code.

    Vaithinatha Iyer v. Kuppu Thevan

    1. The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is based on grounds which do not support it. There is no duty cast on a Magistrate to adjourn a case because an application is being made to a superior Magistrate for transfer. That duty is confined to cases where the application is to be to the High Court; Section 526, Criminal Procedure Code. It appears from the record that the requirements of Section 256 as to requiring the accused to state whether he wishes to cross-examine any witness were complied with. There is no provision requiring the Magistrate to offer an opportunity to the accused to have his witnesses summoned. It is his right to apply and he did not exercise it. I set aside the order for re-trial and direct the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to take the appeal on his file and dispose of it according to law.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Vaithinatha Iyer v. Kuppu Thevan
    (Aug 30, 1912)