Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    K. Appal Swamy Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party.

    1. This is a reference made by the District Magistrate of Cuttack under Section 438 of the Cr PC, of the case of a station master who has been convicted under Section 120 of the Railways Act and sentenced to pay a fine of only Rs. 5 for having addressed another member of the clerical staff of the station in abusive and obscene language. I am not disposed to accept the view of the learned Magistrate that the word “person” in S. 120 does not include an employee of the railway and respectfully agree with the decision of the Calcutta (Madras?) High Court in the case of Guffiy v. Mahumadali (1) in which it was held that the section does apply to railway servants.

    2. The reference is accordingly discharged.

    K.S

    3. Reference discharged.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    K. Appal Swamy Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party.
    (Aug 2, 1933)