Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Order XLI, Rule 33, of the Code of Civil Procedure
  • Article 44 of the Limitation Act is the Article
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Order XLI, Rule 33, of the Code of Civil Procedure
  • Article 44 of the Limitation Act is the Article

    Subbarayalu Naidu v. Papammal

    1. There is no doubt that Article 44 of the Limitation Act is the Article properly applicable: and that the suit is time barred as regards all the suit properties. Its dismissal as against the defendants who did not appeal and were not impleaded in the lower Appellate Court is justified by Order XLI, Rule 33, of the Code of Civil Procedure vide Peria Krishnasami Naik v. Aiyappa Naik 24 Ind. Cas. 924 : 1 L.W. 376 and Venkatachela Pillai v. Ranga Pillai 28 Ind. Cas. 694 : 17 M.L.T. 220 : 28 M.L.J. 334.

    2. The second appeal is dismissed with costs (one set).

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Subbarayalu Naidu v. Papammal
    (Mar 24, 1915)