Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Mannu Khan () v. Chandi Prasad And Others (S).

    Ryves, J.:— Mannu Khan laid information before the Magistrate in consequence of which action was taken under section 107 of the Cr PC against a number of persons. After enquiry the Magistrate discharged these persons under section 119 of the Cr PC and held that the complaint made against them was vexatious and frivolous, and ordered the complainant to pay them each Rs. 15 as compensation under section 250 of the Cr PC. On revision before the learned District Magistrate, he has referred the case to this Court with a recommendation that the order under Section 250 be set aside. Section 250 is only applicable in a case instituted by complaint or of information given to a Police Officer or to a Magistrate whereupon a person is accused before a Magistrate of “an offence”. It has been held by this Court in Ram Sukh Rai v. Mahadeo Rai (1) that Section 250 does not apply to an enquiry under Section 107 of the Cr PC. That ruling followed an earlier ruling of this Court which laid down the same principle, viz., Queen Empress v. Lakhpat (2). It seems to me that those cases are in point. I accordingly accept the reference and direct that if the fines ordered to be paid under Section 250 have been paid, they be refunded, otherwise the order for payment is set aside.

    2. (Order set aside).

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Mannu Khan () v. Chandi Prasad And Others (S).
    (Jun 16, 1922)