Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Natesa Udayan v. Annasami Udayan

    1. The judgment under appeal is in accordance with a current of decisions of this Court [Singaravelu Pillai v. Santhana Krishna Mudaliar 31 Ind. Cas. 9 : (1915) M.W.N. 643, Mohammad Husain Saib v. Abdul Kareem Saib 29 Ind Cas. 237 : 17 M.L.T. 424 and Balaji Rao v. Harirama Chetty 21 Ind. Cas. 318 : 38 B. 32 : 15 Bom. L.R. 841 which, no doubt, are not yet included in the authorised reports, but in which we concur. The appeal against appellate order is, therefore, unsustainable and is dismissed with costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Natesa Udayan v. Annasami Udayan
    (Mar 29, 1916)