Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Ayyakutti Mankondan v. Periasami Koundan

    We think that Exhibit VIII is a formal declaration of division of status attested by witnesses and that as such it affects the immoveable properties mentioned therein, and is inadmissible in evidence. We accordingly direct Exhibit VIII and the evidence relating thereto to be excluded from the record, and have decided to call on the District Judge to submit revised findings on issues 1 and 4 on the evidence on record. The findings should be submitted in six weeks. Seven days will be allowed for filing objections. The other questions are reserved.

    [In compliance with the order contained in the above judgment, the District Judge of Madura submitted findings which were in favour of the appellant and the High Court, accepting the same set aside the decree of the Lower Appellate Court and restored that of the Munsif with costs in the High Court and the Lower Appellate Court].

    Appeal allowed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ayyakutti Mankondan v. Periasami Koundan
    (Oct 15, 1915)