Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 127 of the Limitation Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 127 of the Limitation Act

    Boo Fatma v. Boo Ghisanboo

    Scott, C.J:— The question in this case is whether Article 127 of the Limitation Act applies to a suit by the daughter of a deceased Mahomedan to recover her share in his property. It was decided under the Act of 1877 by an Appellate Bench of this Court in 1885 in Sayad Gulam Hussein v. Bibi Anvarnisa that it did so apply, and that decision, so far as we are aware, has been followed in Bombay for the last 23 years. It is a decision which is binding upon us and we therefore hold that the suit falls within Article 127. Upon this point, therefore, the judgment of the lower appellate Court is confirmed.

    Decree confirmed.
    G.B.R
    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Boo Fatma v. Boo Ghisanboo
    (Jul 26, 1909)