Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • section 517, Criminal Procedure Code,
  • Section 33(2)(a) of the Stamp Act
  • section 38(2) of the Stamp Act.
  • section 40(3) of the same Act.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • section 517, Criminal Procedure Code,
  • Section 33(2)(a) of the Stamp Act
  • section 38(2) of the Stamp Act.
  • section 40(3) of the same Act.

    King-Emperor v. Balu Kuppayyan

    The documents in question are, as we understand the case, in the legal custody of the Collector, having been sent to him under section 38(2) of the Stamp Act. The Collector will have to return them to the Deputy Magistrate under section 40(3) of the same Act. When they have been so returned the Deputy Magistrate may dispose of them under section 517, Criminal Procedure Code, and we have no doubt that he will do so without any unnecessary delay.

    We have no authority to order the return of the documents to the party at this stage unless the action of the Deputy Magistrate in impounding them under Section 33(2)(a) of the Stamp Act was illegal. It is argued that the action of the Deputy Magistrate was illegal, because the documents did not come before him in the performance of his functions within the meaning of section 33(1), but we are unable to accept this contention. The Word “comes” is sufficiently wide to include the production of documents under a search-warrant issued by the Magistrate.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    King-Emperor v. Balu Kuppayyan
    (Oct 28, 1901)