Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Emperor v. Shambhu Nath And Others

    Walsh, J.:— In this case I am content to rest my judgement on the decision in Queen-Empress v. Abdul Kadir. There must be definite evidence in the case of any and every person charged under this section that there is a danger of a breach of the peace by him. It is clearly insufficient against a collective body of persons to suggest that they are indulging in feelings of hostility towards another body of persons. Man is a gregarious animal and apt to associate himself with friends, and, when he has got nothing else to do, to indulge his feelings of hostility towards his rival and his friends. These feelings are very much to be deplored; but they do not entitle a Magistrate to make orders wholesale under this section.

    Order set aside.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Emperor v. Shambhu Nath And Others
    (May 12, 1916)