Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • section 498 of the Indian Penal Code,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • section 498 of the Indian Penal Code,

    Emperor v. Buddhu And Another

    Knox, J.:— Buddhu and Juggan, who have been convicted of an offence under section 498 of the Indian Penal Code, have put in an application praying for revision of their sentences. In their application they have called particular attention to the fact that the conviction under section 498 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be sustained inasmuch as it has not been strictly proved that marriage and all necessary rites were duly celebrated between the complainant and the woman in question. They have also pointed out that the mere statement of the husband that he is married to the woman is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. This Court, in Queen-Empress v. Dal Singh , has laid down that a court trying a case under section 498 of the Indian Penal Code should require some better evidence of the marriage than the mere statement of the complainant and the Woman. There appears to be no evidence of a better kind in this case, I set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that Buddhu and Juggan, if in custody, be released, if on bail, their bail bonds be discharged.

    Conviction set aside.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Emperor v. Buddhu And Another
    (Mar 12, 1920)