Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of Section 3(i) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act
  • Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act.
  • Section 302 I.P.C.
  • Section 506 I.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of Section 3(i) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act
  • Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act.
  • Section 302 I.P.C.
  • Section 506 I.P.C.

    Jaikaran v. State Of U P

    Bhanwar Singh, J.-

    Heard.

    2. The accused-applicant Jaikaran has been booked under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act.

    3. A perusal of the Gang chart shows that he is involved in two cases one under Section 302 I.P.C. and the other under Section 506 I.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the informant of the case registered under Section 302 I.P.C. has subsequently lodged the report in other case with a view to install his application for bail. Initially the applicant was not named in the case registered under Section 302 I.P.C.

    4. Without prejudice to the prosecution case, it may be observed at this juncture that it was virtually one case whereby the provisions of Section 3(i) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act could not be attracted. It is, therefore, a good case for bail.

    5. Let the accused-applicant be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Gangsters Act Lucknow.

    Bail granted.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Jaikaran v. State Of U P
    (Feb 14, 2002)