AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 40-A(7)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 40-A(7)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act

    Peria Karamalai Tea & Produce Co. Ltd., Coimbatore v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin .

    Order

    1. The High Court has answered the question of law which was referred to it in favour of the Revenue by coming to the conclusion, on interpreting Section 40-A(7)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, that the appellant was not entitled to claim deduction of Rs 11,96,413 which had been allowed by the Tribunal, because it had not made provision for the said amount in the accounting years relevant to the respective assessment years. In respect of Assessment Year 1975-76, with which the High Court was concerned, it was found that the said sum of Rs 11,96,413 was not in respect of the accounting year relevant to Assessment Year 1975-76 and, therefore, was not allowable as a deduction.

    2. We do not find any infirmity in the decision of the High Court and, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Peria Karamalai Tea & Produce Co. Ltd., Coimbatore v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin .
    (Feb 10, 1998)