AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion addresses two miscellaneous criminal petitions: one seeking exemption from filing an official translation and another requesting an extension of time to file an undertaking. The court considered these procedural requests and issued its order accordingly.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court briefly noted the “background of the facts that have been pointed out” and, on that basis, granted the procedural relief sought:

  • It found sufficient cause to allow the exemption from filing the official translation.
  • It deemed it appropriate to extend the deadline for filing the required undertaking until the end of May 2010, thereby partially allowing the second application.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The court ALLOWED Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10532 of 2010 and ALLOWED, to the extent of extending time, Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10528 of 2010.

Implications: The order grants the immediate procedural relief requested by the applicants. It does not establish any new legal precedent and affects only the timelines and filing requirements for the parties involved in this matter.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Bharat Amratlal Kothari v. Dosukhan Samadkhan Sindhi & Ors

    We have perused the Miscellaneous Petitions. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10532 of 2010 seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed.

    As far as Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10528 of 2010 is concerned, in the background of the facts that have been pointed out, we extend the time for filing of the undertaking up to the end of May, 2010. The application is allowed to the above extent.

    ...................J [HARJIT SINGH BEDI] ...................J [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN] NEW DELHI MAY 06, 2010.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Bharat Amratlal Kothari v. Dosukhan Samadkhan Sindhi & Ors
    (May 6, 2010)