Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2007 INSC 969
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2007 INSC 969
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Narpat Singh v. Rajasthan Financial Corporation

    I.A. No.15-16 of 2007 ORDER We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

    I.A. No. 15-16 for clarification and direction of Court's Order dated 3.5.2007 are totally misconceived. Moreover, ordinarily nos. I.A. lies after a case is finally disposed of. Ordinarily, an I.A. is maintainable only in a pending case. Once a case is finally disposed of the Court becomes functus officio, and thereafter an I.A. lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or accidental mistakes. The same are accordingly, dismissed.

    Put up the Contempt Petitions (C) No. 151 -152 of 2007 in Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001 after six months.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Narpat Singh v. Rajasthan Financial Corporation
    (Sep 24, 2007)