AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1999 INSC 241
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1999 INSC 241
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Sita Ram Singhania v. Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. And Others

    1. We see no reason why the High Courts in such matters filed by the defendants in suits instituted by the banks before the Debt Recovery Tribunal should more or less as a matter of course grant stay of proceedings before the tribunals. The very purpose of setting up the tribunals will be lost by granting stay merely because there is challenge to the notification constituting the tribunal. In the present case, the High Court has rightly come to the conclusion that as the proceedings were initiated in the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court had no jurisdiction.

    2. The special leave petition is dismissed.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Sita Ram Singhania v. Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. And Others
    (May 11, 1999)