Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 39(d) of the Constitution
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 39(d) of the Constitution
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Basudev Pati v. State Of Orissa And Another

    Order

    1. This special leave petition is filed against the order of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack passed on 6-12-1996, in Transfer Application No. 610 of 1987.

    2. Admittedly, the petitioner, while working as a Lecturer, had appeared in the competitive examination and was selected to the Orissa Administrative Service. As Orissa Administrative Service, Class II, his scale of pay was Rs 525-1150. Earlier, also when he worked as Lecturer, the scale of pay was Rs 525-1150 which was subsequently revised by the University Grants Commission w.e.f 1-4-1974 to Rs 700-1600. In that pay scale, his pay was fixed at Rs 780. He was paid arrears of salary with retrospective effect from 1-1-1974. After he was selected and appointed to the Orissa Administrative Service, he sought protection of his last drawn pay and his upgraded fitment in the pay scale in the Orissa Administrative Service. The Tribunal has rejected the claim. Thus this special leave petition.

    3. Shri Janaranjan Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contends that since the petitioner had been given the pay scale with retrospective effect from 1-1-1974, on his appointment to the Orissa Administrative Service, his last drawn pay needs to be protected. As per the instructions of the Accountant General, his pay is entitled to be fixed at Rs 780 in the pay scale in the service of Orissa Administrative Service. We find no force in the contention. The service as a Lecturer is entirely different from the service of the Orissa Administrative Service. Merely because he happened to work earlier as a Lecturer and in the same pay scale which was subsequently revised, he cannot be permitted to have the benefit of UGC scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in the pay scale on that basis. That would create imbalance and gross infraction and distortion and would result in flood of claims of similarly situated persons under Article 39(d) of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, such a course cannot be permitted to be adopted.

    4. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Basudev Pati v. State Of Orissa And Another
    (Mar 3, 1997)