Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1996 INSC 945
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1996 INSC 945
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    I.T.C Limited v. Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay .

    Order

    1. The points raised in this appeal are covered squarely against the appellant by the decision of this Court in Pankaj Jain Agencies v. Union of India (1994) 5 SCC 198 wherein it was emphatically stated as under:

    “We, therefore, see no substance in the contention that notwithstanding the publication in the Official Gazette there was yet a failure to make the law known and that, therefore, the notification did not acquire the elements of operativeness and enforceability. This contention of Shri Ganesh is unacceptable.”

    2. We may also observe that rejection by the tribunal of the appellant's case even on the admitted position that on the very date of issue of notification there was a radio announcement about the changes brought about by these notifications; and also a press release is another ground to justify rejection of the appellant's claim. Accordingly, there is no ground to admit this appeal.

    3. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    I.T.C Limited v. Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay .
    (Aug 26, 1996)