Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

    Union Of India v. Jai Narain Singh .

    Order

    1. Delay condoned. Special leave granted.

    2. We have heard both the learned counsel, for the Union of India (the appellant) and the respondent. We have not the slightest hesitation in holding that the Central Ground Water Board is not an industry. The contrary finding rendered by the Tribunal in the impugned order is incorrect. It follows Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 will have no application. Accordingly, the appeal deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. However, we may add that having regard to the length of service of the respondent, this is a fit case in which the appellant must take sympathetic attitude and appoint him as a fresh candidate as a Helper and his service is to reckon only from the date of his appointment. We are informed by the learned counsel for the respondent that the said post has been redesignated as Technical Operator (Drilling). The appointment order should be issued on or before 31-3-1994. We make it clear that he shall have no claim for back wages in relation to the earlier service rendered by him.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Union Of India v. Jai Narain Singh .
    (Feb 9, 1994)