Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and neither Section 57 of the Penal Code
  • section 428, Cr. P.C,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and neither Section 57 of the Penal Code
  • section 428, Cr. P.C,

    Bhimsen v. The State Of Rajasthan

    V.P Tyagi, A.C.J:— Convict Bhimsen has sent this application through the Jail authority praying that the period of detention already undergone by him during the investigation and trial be given a set off against the sentence for life imprisonment awarded to him.

    2. Sec. 428 of the New Code of Criminal Procedure has made a provision for giving a set off for a period of detention already undergone by the accused during the investigation, inquiry or trial, but according to this provision this set off can be allowed only when the accused has been sentenced to an imprisonment for a term. In the present case the accused was sentenced to imprisonment for life. The Supreme Court in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ratan Singh (1) has determined this question whether imprisonment for life can be treated as one for a term of 20 years. The learned judges have observed as follows:—

    “A sentence for life would enure till the lifetime of the accused as it is not possible to fix a particular period of the prisoner's death so any remission given under the Rules could not be regarded as a substiute for a sentence of sentence for life. The ruler framed under the Prisons Act or under the Jail Manual do not affect the total period which the prisoner has to suffer but marely amount to administrative instrcuctoins regarding the various remissions to be given to the prisoaer from time to time in accordance with the rules. The question of remission of the entire sentence or a part of it lies with the excluive domain of the appropriate Government under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and neither Section 57 of the Penal Code nor any Rules or local Acts can stultify the effect of the sentence of life imprisonment given by the Court under Penal Code. The prisnoer canaot be released automatically on the expiry of 20 years.”

    In view of these observations of the Supreme Court the prisoner cannot claim that he was sentenced to imprisonment for a term. No set off can, therefore, be claimed under section 428, Cr. P.C, for the period of detention undergone during the investigation, inquiry or trial, if the sentence awarded to the prisoner is a sentence for life.

    3. The application of the convict is, therefore, rejacted. He may be informed accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Bhimsen v. The State Of Rajasthan
    (Sep 29, 1976)