Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 124A or Section 153A or S. 295A, Penal Code. 3. Section 99-D of the Code
  • PENAL CODE
  • Section 99-B, Criminal P. C., hereinafter referred
  • Section 295A, Penal Code. 35.
  • Section 99-A of the Code
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 124A or Section 153A or S. 295A, Penal Code. 3. Section 99-D of the Code
  • PENAL CODE
  • Section 99-B, Criminal P. C., hereinafter referred
  • Section 295A, Penal Code. 35.
  • Section 99-A of the Code
Smart Summary

Structured Summary of the Opinion — Criminal Original No. 35 of 1952

Factual and Procedural Background

Shri Shiv-ram Das Udasi applied under Section 99-B of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside an order passed by the State Government under Section 99-A forfeiting to Government every copy of the book titled "Gurmat Vichar Suraj" and all documents containing copies, reprints, translations or extracts of that book. The State Government's order of forfeiture, dated 29-2-1952, identified passages at pages 184, 246, 248, 259, 272, 291, 302 and 312 as being punishable under Section 295A of the Penal Code. Under Section 99-D of the Code, the Special Bench was to set aside the forfeiture order if it was not satisfied that the book contained matter punishable under Section 124A, Section 153A or Section 295A, Penal Code.

The parties agreed that the book did not contain seditious matter punishable under Section 124A nor matter promoting enmity between classes under Section 153A. The remaining contested issue was whether the book contained material maliciously intended to outrage religious feelings under Section 295A. The court examined the relevant passages in the book, considered their context and meaning (including citations from the Sikh scriptures), and delivered its decision setting aside the forfeiture order. The bench delivering the opinion included Bhandari, C.J., with concurrences by Falshaw, J. and another judge (whose short concurrence appears as "I agree").

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the book "Gurmat Vichar Suraj" contains any matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A, Penal Code (sedition).
  2. Whether the book contains any matter punishable under Section 153A, Penal Code (promoting enmity between classes).
  3. Whether the book contains matter which is deliberately and maliciously intended to outrage the feelings of any class of citizens of India by insulting their religion or religious beliefs, such that it falls within Section 295A, Penal Code.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court's analysis proceeded in a series of focused steps, closely tied to the statutory tests of the Penal Code and the procedural provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code:

  1. Initial narrowing of issues: It was common ground before the court that the book did not contain seditious matter under Section 124A nor matter promoting inter-class enmity under Section 153A. Therefore the court confined its inquiry to whether the text fell within Section 295A (outraging religious feelings by deliberate and malicious insult).
  2. Identification of objected passages: The State Government relied on specified passages (pages 184, 246, 248, 259, 272, 291, 302 and 312) as the basis for forfeiture. Counsel conceded that some passages (259, 272, 302 and 312) did not fall within Section 295A; the primary contested passages for consideration were 184, 246, 248 and 291.
  3. Close textual and contextual reading: The court examined the substance and tone of the objected passages rather than isolating phrases. Examples of the court's textual findings include:
    • Page 184: The author criticises a poetic composition of Shri Bhag Mal and, in the course of discussion, defends certain actions or attributes (e.g., married life of Guru Har Rai, battles fought by Guru Har Gobind and Guru Gobind Singh, and collection of tithes) to justify analogous conduct in the ten incarnations of Vishnu. The court observed that the author appears to accept the conduct of the Gurus as ideal and uses that acceptance to explain or justify other matters.
    • Page 146 and related passages: The author suggests that Guru Teg Bahadur's slok implies the soul is perishable. The court reviewed the cited slok and other hymns from the Sri Guru Granth Sahib and related writings (quotes from Guru Teg Bahadur, Guru Arjan, Guru Gobind Singh, Guru Amar Das and Bhai Gurdas) and concluded that, properly read in context, the scriptures commonly describe the body as perishable while affirming the soul's eternity; the author's interpretation, the court held, reflected a misconception rather than a deliberate insult.
    • Page 248: The author commented on a kabit of Bhai Gur Das concerning the Sikhs' refraining from worship of other gods "but not insultingly or disdainfully," and the court noted passages in Sikh scriptures that emphasize worship is due to God alone and that the Sri Guru Granth Sahib is the embodiment of the Gurus' message.
    • Page 291: The author expressed the opinion that the Sikh Gurus did not repudiate the institution of caste. The court countered that statement by reference to Guru Nanak and other Gurus' teachings condemning caste pride; the court treated the author's view as an incorrect opinion rather than malicious disrespect.
  4. Legal standard for Section 295A: The court reiterated the legal test that to bring material within Section 295A it is not merely the subject-matter but the manner of expression that matters — the words used must be such that any reasonable person would regard them as grossly offensive and as maliciously and deliberately intended to outrage religious feelings of a class. The court emphasized that the requisite element is deliberate and malicious intent to outrage.
  5. Application of the standard to the book: On the basis of the contextual readings and comparisons with authoritative Sikh texts cited in the opinion, the court found no passages that show disrespect to the Sikh Gurus or to the Sri Guru Granth Sahib in the sense required by Section 295A. Instead, the author consistently professes acceptance of the Gurus' message and offers his own interpretations; where the author appears mistaken, the court characterised those instances as misconceptions or misinterpretations rather than grossly offensive or malicious attacks.
  6. Conclusion of analysis: Because the passages complained of did not, in the court's view, evince the deliberate, malicious intent required by Section 295A, the statutory condition for upholding forfeiture under Section 99-A was not satisfied.

Holding and Implications

Holding: For the reasons given above, the court set aside the State Government's order dated 29-2-1952 forfeiting to Government every copy of the book "Gurmat Vichar Suraj" and all documents containing copies, reprints, translations or extracts from that book.

Immediate consequences for the parties:

  • The forfeiture order was quashed and the applicant's challenge succeeded.
  • The court found that Shri Shivram Das Udasi was "ill-advised" to write the book in 1951 but, on balance, left the parties to bear their own costs.
  • Bhandari, C.J., delivered the principal reasoning; Falshaw, J., and another judge concurred (Falshaw explicitly agreeing and the third judge stating "I agree").

Broader implications: The opinion does not state that it sets any new legal precedent beyond applying the established statutory test for Section 295A. The court's conclusion rests on the statutory standard that the manner and malicious intent of expression are determinative; the opinion confines itself to the direct effect on the forfeiture order and the parties' costs.

This summary is limited to information explicitly contained in the provided opinion text. No external facts or precedents have been introduced.

    Shiv Ram Dass Udasin v. The Punjab State

    1. In Criminal Original No. 35 of 1952 Shri Shiv-ram Das Udasi applies under Section 99-B, Criminal P. C., hereinafter referred to as the Code, that the order passed by the State Government under Section 99-A of the Code forfeiting to the Government every copy of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' and all the documents containing copies, reprints and translations of or extracts from that book may be set aside.

    2. In Criminal Original No. 35 of 1952 the point for consideration is whether the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' contains any matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or S. 295A, Penal Code.

    3. Section 99-D of the Code provides that the Special Bench shall, if it is not satisfied that the book contains matter punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 295A, Penal Code, set aside) the order of forfeiture.

    4. In these proceedings it is common ground that the boob does not contain any seditious matter punishable under Section 124A or any matter which promotes or is intended to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of citizens of India punishable under section 153a, penal code. That being the position of matters, the question that arises for decision is whether the book contains matter which is deliberately and maliciously intended to outrage the feelings of any class of citizens of India by insulting the religion or the religious beliefs of that class.

    5. In 1898 Bhai Kahan Singh published the book called 'Ham Hindu Nahin' wherein he stressed the points of difference on religious mat-ters between the Hindus and the Sikhs.

    6. In 1937-38 Shri Shivram Das Udasi wrote the book called 'Gurmat Darpan'. In that book Shri Shivram Das Udasi maintained inter alia that inasmuch as the Sikh Gurus had made supreme sacrifices for the protection of Hindu culture the Gurus were Hindus. That book was published by Sardar Bulaqi Singh and Sardar Amar Singh of Gujrat, Punjab.

    7. In April, 1939 Shri Bhag Mal Udasi published the book called 'Gurmat Darshan' wherein he made an attempt to show that the point of view expressed by Shri Shivram Das Udasi in the book called 'Gurmat Darpan' was erroneous.

    8. In February, 1951 Shri Shivram Das Udasi published book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' wherein he dealt with points raised by Shri Bhag Mal Udasi in 'Gurmat Darshan' and Bhai Khan Singh in 'Ham Hindu Nahin'.

    9. By order passed on 29-2-1952, the State Government has declared to be forfeited to Government every copy of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' and all the documents containing copies, reprints, and translations of or extracts from 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj'. In passing orders under Section 99-A of the Code the State Government thought that the passages appearing at pages 184, 246, 248, 259, 272, 291, 302, and 312 of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' were punishable under section 295a, penal code.

    10. Indisputably, it is no defence to a charge under Section 295A, Penal Code, for anyone to plead that he was writing a book in reply to the one written by one professing another religion who has attacked his own religion.

    11. In arguments it was conceded that the publication of passages appearing at pages 259, 272, 302 and 312 of the book does not fall within S, 295-A, Penal Code. Indeed it was said that the objectionable passages in the books were those to be found at pages 184, 246, 248, and 291 of the book.

    12. Shri Bhag Mal maintained in the book called 'Gurmat Darshan', that God is not in the guise of the Hindu deity, Vishnu. In that book Shri Bhag Mal prefaced his discussion by his own poetic composition. In the passage appearing at page 184 of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' Shri Shivram Das Udasi has criticised the passage from the poetic composition of Shri Bhag Mal reading "Ram Krishan 'Avtar Asur Sangharan Karne Sirje Sirjanhar'."

    15. In justifying the married life of Hindu deities Shri Shivram Das Udasi makes reference to the life of Guru Har Rai. In considering that matter the author maintains that the Sikh Gurus having married, no objection can be made to the ten incarnations of Vishnu on the ground that they were married. In 'Raj Magh.' Guru Arjan says that "the devotion of the house-holder is superior to that of the anchoret".

    16. Again, in the passage under consideration it is said that the ten incarnations of Vishnu cannot be said to be full of anger for the reason that they destroyed the demons. In discussing that matter Shri Shivram Das Udasi cites with approval the battles fought by Guru Har Gobind and Guru Gobind Singh against tyranny and oppression and the punishment imposed upon the 'Masands' by Guru Gobind Singh.

    17. In the passage appearing at page 184 of the book the author refers to collection of 'tithes' ordered by the Gurus and maintains that the mere possession of wealth is no evidence of greed.

    18. Prom that I have said above, it is plain that in the passage appearing at page 184 of the book the author seems to accept the conduct of the Gurus to be the Ideal Conduct and on that basis seeks to justify the conduct of the ten incarnations of Vishnu.

    19. In the passage appearing at page 146 of the book Shri Shivram Das Udasi seems to think that Guru Teg Bahadur thought that the soul was perishable. In this connection he cites the 'Slok' of Guru Teg Bahadur which reads

    What is born dieth to-day, to-morrow, or the next day; Nanak, sing God's praises and lay aside all entanglements.

    20. Plainly, in this 'Slok' Guru Teg Bahadur emphasises the eternal truth that death is certain for all. In the hymns of the Gurus the soul is described to be 'unborn', 'undying', 'deathless' and 'birthless'.

    21. In 'Rag' Devgandhari Guru Teg Bahadur sang "All thy relations are only for life; Thy mother, father, brothers, sons, kinsmen and the wife of thy house, 'When the soul parteth from thy body, cry out and call thee a ghost';

    Nobody keepeth thee even half a 'ghari'; they expel thee from the house."

    22. In numerous hymns to be found in the 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' bodies are said to die but the soul which possesses the body is stated to be eternal.

    23. In 'Rag' Asa Guru Arjan Sang "***** The soul neither dieth nor is born;

    *****

    24. In 'Akal Ustat' Guru Gobind Singh described the Sikh conception of the manner in which souls emanate from God and are again absorbed in Him in these words :

    "As from one lire millions of sparks arise; though arising separately, they unite again in the fire;

    As from one heap of dust several particles of dust fill the air, and on filling it again blend with the dust;

    As in one stream millions of waves are produced; the waves being made of water all become water;

    So from God's form non-sentient and sentient things are manifested, and, springing from Him shall ail be united in Him again".

    25. Shri Shivram Das Udasi seems to think that the immortality of soul conflicts with the Gurus' teaching that God is without a 'second'. In the noble words of Guru Gobind Singh cited above the soul comes forth from God and is always really in Him as a partial expression of His Will.

    26. In considering tho matter Shri Shivram Das Udasi thought that the basic teaching of the Gurus being that there is no vicarious atonement the thought expressed by Guru Teg Bahadur in the 'Slok' cited above conflicts with that doctrine. In expressing that view Shri Shivram Das Udasi thought that the soul was perishable.

    27. In 'Sri Rag' Guru Amar Das said :

    The 'pandits' induced by wordly gain read, and read, and recite the 'vedas', The fool who in his love of mammon forgetteth God's Name, shall be punished therefor.

    In commenting upon that thought Shri Shivram Das Udasi expresses the opinion that the 'Granthis' induced by wordly gain read and read and recite 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' and shall also be punished.

    28. In the passage appearing at page 248 of the book the author comments upon the 'Kabit' of Bhai Gur Das reading :

    "As a virtuous woman ever thinketh on her husband and desireth not to behold another man;

    As the 'chatrik' never longeth for lakes, rivers, or seas, but for cloud-drops and singeth the praises of the Beloved;

    As the 'chakor' in no way desireth to behold the sun, but in every way longeth for the moon, which is dearer to it than life; So do the Guru's Sikhs naturally refrain from worshipping other gods, but not insultingly or disdainfully."

    29. In numerous passages appearing in the 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' the Gurus have emphasised that worship is due to God alone. In the days when the Sikh Gurus lived they were not worshipped by the Sikhs and the 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' being the embodiment of the ten Gurus is not the object of worship with the Sikhs.

    30. In tho passage appearing at page 291 of ' the book Shri Shivram Das Udasi expresses the opinion that the Sikh Gurus did not repudiate the institution of caste system. That he was wrong in so thinking is plain from what Guru Nanak said in 'Sri Rag Ki War' : "Castes are folly, names are folly".

    31. In 'Rag Bhairo' Guru Amar Das said :

    'Let none be proud of his caste, He who knoweth God is a Brahman. O! Stupid fool, be not proud of thy caste;

    From such pride many sins result. Everybody saith there are four castes, But they all proceeded from God's seed. The world is all made out of one clay, But the Potter fashioned it into vessels of many sorts. The body is formed from tho union of five elements;

    Let any one consider 'if he hath' less or more 'in his composition'.

    Saith Nanak, the soul is fettered by its acts, Without meeting the true Guru salvation is not obtained."

    32. In writing about the mission of Guru Nanak 'Bhai' Gurdas said that Guru Nanak established 'Avarn Asharam' in India.

    33. Prom what I have said above, it is plain that the passages to which objection is taken in the order of forfeiture there seems to be some misconception of thought.

    34. In order to bring the case within section 295a, of the code it is not so much the matter of discourse as the manner of it. In other words, the words used should be such as are bound to be regarded by any reasonable man as grossly offensive and provocative and maliciously and deliberately intended to outrage the feelings of any class of citizens of India. In no part of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' is there any passage showing disrespect to the Sikh Gurus or the 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib'. From what I have seen in the book it is plain that the author professes to accept the message of the Gurus as contained in the 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' but seeks to place his own interpretation on that message. That being the position of matters, I do not think that the publication falls within section 295a, penal code.

    35. For the foregoing reasons, I set aside the order of forfeiture passed by the State Government on 29-2-1952 forfeiting to Government every copy of the book called 'Gurmat Vichar Suraj' and all the documents containing copies, reprints, and translations of or extracts from that book.

    36. Finding, however, that Shri Shivram Das Udasi was ill-advised to write the book called "Gurmat Vichar Suraj" in 1951 I leave the parties to bear their own costs.

    Bhandari, C.J.

    37. I agree with my learned brother that the book does not contain any matter punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 295A, Penal Code, & consequently that the order of forfeiture must be set aside, I would leave the parties to bear their own costs.

    Falshaw, J.

    38. I agree.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Shiv Ram Dass Udasin v. The Punjab State
    (Apr 5, 1954)