Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2010 DHC 3016
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • under:xxxxxx18.6) Clause (b) of Section 31(7)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2010 DHC 3016
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • under:xxxxxx18.6) Clause (b) of Section 31(7)
Smart Summary

Judicial Opinion Summary — Rekha Sharma, J.

Factual and Procedural Background

The arbitrator awarded Rs. 5,50,000 towards rectification of defects and miscellaneous claims, directing payment within 30 days of receipt of the award. The award contained no direction about interest from the date of the award until realization. The award was challenged before the Additional District Judge, who dismissed the challenge. An appeal to this Court was also unsuccessful. Following dismissal of the appeal, the appellant filed execution proceedings before the Additional District Judge. During execution the respondent/judgment-debtor tendered the principal sum of Rs. 5,50,000 by way of a Pay Order, which was ordered to be released to the appellant/decree-holder. The decree-holder claimed interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the award until payment relying on Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Additional District Judge, by order dated July 17, 2009, declined to grant post-award interest on the ground that the court must execute the award as it stands and, since the arbitrator did not award interest, the claim for interest was deemed refused. The decree-holder appealed to this Court challenging that refusal.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether a court should direct payment of interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the arbitral award until realization where the arbitral award is silent about post-award interest, having regard to Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Arguments of the Parties

Appellant / Decree-holder's Arguments

  • The decree-holder contended that, in view of Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, he was entitled to interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award until payment, and could claim that amount in execution notwithstanding that the award itself was silent on post-award interest.

Respondent / Judgment-debtor and Lower Court's Position

  • The Additional District Judge declined to grant interest on the basis that the court's role in execution is to execute the award as it stands; since the arbitrator did not award post-award interest, that silence was to be treated as a refusal of interest and no additional interest could be directed by the court. (Order dated July 17, 2009)

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
State of Haryana v. S.L Arora and Company reported in 2010 (2) SCALE 541 Interpretation of Clause (b) of Section 31(7): where an arbitral award is silent about interest from the date of the award to the date of payment, the sum directed to be paid shall carry interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award to the date of payment; if the award specifies a different rate or specifically refuses interest, Clause (b) does not apply. The higher rate is intended to discourage dilatory tactics by award-debtors. The Court relied on and applied the stated principles from the Apex Court decision to hold that, because the award in the present case is silent as to post-award interest, Section 31(7)(b) mandates interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award until payment.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court began by reproducing Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: "A sum directed to be paid by an arbitral award shall, unless the award otherwise directs, carry interest at the rate of eighteen per centum per annum from the date of the award to the date of payment." The Court interpreted clause (b) to mean that where an award makes no provision for interest from the date of the award until payment, clause (b) operates to impose interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award until realization. The Court noted the corollary that where the arbitrator has expressly awarded interest for the period from the award to payment, even at a different rate, that rate governs unless modified by the Court on objections to the award.

The Court then applied the binding reasoning of the Apex Court in State of Haryana v. S.L. Arora and Company (2010 (2) SCALE 541), which explains that clause (b) aims to ensure prompt compliance by imposing a high rate where post-award interest is not specified. The Court found that the award in the present case was silent on post-award interest; accordingly, clause (b) applied and entitled the decree-holder to interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award till payment. The Court disagreed with the Additional District Judge's view that silence amounted to refusal and that the court could not award interest in execution; instead, the statutory mandate applied.

Holding and Implications

APPEAL ALLOWED — The amount awarded by the arbitrator (Rs. 5,50,000) shall carry interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the award until payment.

Direct effect: The decree-holder is entitled to post-award interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award until realization of payment. The Court applied existing precedent and statutory interpretation; it did not purport to lay down a new principle of law beyond applying Section 31(7)(b) as explained by the Apex Court.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Madhu Mehra v. Pritpal Singh .

    Rekha Sharma, J.:— Should the court in a case where an arbitral award is silent with regard to the payment of interest from the date of the award till realization, direct payment of interest for the said period @ 18% per annum having regard to the provisions of Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?

    2. The above, in short, is the point in issue.

    3. It is not in dispute that in the case in hand, the arbitrator has simply awarded a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- towards rectification of defects and other miscellaneous claims, with a direction for payment of the same within 30 days of the receipt of the award but with no further direction for payment of interest from the date of the award till realization. The award in question was challenged before Additional District Judge who dismissed the same against which an appeal was preferred in this Court which also met with no success.

    4. Consequent to the dismissal of the appeal, the appellant filed execution in the Court of Additional District Judge. During the execution proceedings, the respondent/judgment-debtor brought the principal sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- by way of a Pay Order which was directed to be released to the appellant/decree-holder. However, the matter did not end there, as according to the appellant/decree-holder, in view of Section 31(7)(b) of the Act, he was also entitled to the interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the award till payment. The learned Additional District Judge vide order dated July 17, 2009 has declined the relief so claimed on the ground that the Court has only to execute the award as it stands and that since the arbitrator has not awarded any interest as claimed by the decree-holder, it is deemed to have been refused.

    5. Feeling aggrieved by the order so passed, the present appeal has been preferred.

    6. Before I proceed to deal with the issue, it will be appropriate to reproduce Section 31(7)(b) of the Act. This is how it runs:—

    “31(7)(b). A sum directed to be paid by an arbitral award shall, unless the award otherwise directs, carry interest at the rate of eighteen per centum per annum from the date of the award to the date of payment.”

    7. It is clear from clause (b) of Section 31(7) of the Act that a sum directed to be paid by an arbitral tribunal shall carry interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the award to the date of payment, unless the award otherwise directs. In other words, it means that if the arbitral tribunal awards no interest from the date of the award till the date of the payment, the mandate of clause (b) shall take effect and the award in that event will carry interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the award till realization. However, if in a given case, the arbitral tribunal does award interest from the date of the award till payment but not @ 18% per annum but at a different rate, then what is awarded by the arbitrator shall hold good, unless the same is modified by the Court on objections filed to the award by either of the parties.

    8. Apart from what has been held above, the issue is covered by a judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana v. S.L Arora and Company reported in 2010 (2) SCALE 541. The relevant part of the judgment which is binding on this Court runs as under:—

    “xxxxxx

    18.6) Clause (b) of Section 31(7) is intended to ensure prompt payment by the award-debtor once the award is made. The said clause provides that the “sum directed to be paid by an arbitral award” shall carry interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of award to the date of payment if the award does not provide otherwise in regard to the interest from the date of the award. This makes it clear that if the award grants interest at a specified rate up to the date of payment, or specifies the rate of interest payable from the date of award till date of payment, or if the award specifically refused interest, Clause (b) of Section 31 will not come into play. But if the award is silent in regard to the interest from the date of award, or does not specify the rate of interest from the date of award, then the party in whose favour an award for money has been made, will be entitled to interest at 18% per annum from the date of award. He may claim the said amount in execution even though there is no reference to any post award interest in the award. Even if the pre-award interest is at much lower rate, if the award is silent in regard to post-award interest, the claimant will be entitled to post-award interest at the higher rate of 18% per annum. The higher rate of interest is provided in Clause (b) with the deliberate intent of discouraging award-debtors from adopting dilatory tactics and to persuade them to comply with the award.”

    9. For what has been noticed above, the appeal is allowed and it is hereby directed that the amount awarded by the arbitrator shall carry interest @ 18% per annum from the date of the award till payment.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Madhu Mehra v. Pritpal Singh .
    (Jun 1, 2010)