Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of section 241, the Central Government
  • section 240. With reference to section 237
  • section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
  • provisions i.e, sections 214, 237, 240
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of section 241, the Central Government
  • section 240. With reference to section 237
  • section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
  • provisions i.e, sections 214, 237, 240
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The dispute concerns assessment year 1967-68. The assessee paid advance tax of Rs. 8,08,667. The assessing officer's assessment order dated March 6, 1972 raised a total demand of Rs. 9,65,331 but did not give credit for tax paid and omitted certain reliefs. The assessee filed an application for rectification on April 10, 1972. By order dated October 10, 1972 the Income-Tax Officer held that a refund of Rs. 3,72,726 was due, but adjusted that refund against demand for assessment year 1968-69 rather than paying it in cash.

The assessee claimed interest under section 214 (interest payable by Government) on its advance tax; the Income-Tax Officer partly denied interest by order dated August 16, 1974. On appeal the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) by order dated July 14, 1976 directed allowance of interest up to October 10, 1972, calculated as Rs. 1,90,499 for the period April 1, 1967 to September 30, 1972 (technically up to October 10, 1972). The refund of this interest was granted on April 21, 1977.

The assessee then claimed further interest under section 244 on the amount Rs. 1,90,499 (i.e., interest on the interest paid). The Income-Tax Officer rejected this claim on November 2, 1977, reasoning that the Act did not provide for interest on interest payable under section 214. The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) affirmed that decision on September 7, 1978, holding that the interest amount was not a "refund" in terms of section 237 and therefore section 244 did not apply. The assessee appealed to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal held that Rs. 1,90,499 became refundable by virtue of the appellate order under section 240 and that, because the Assessing Officer failed to grant the refund within the stipulated period, the assessee was entitled to interest on that amount under section 244. The Tribunal awarded interest for the period November 1, 1976 to April 21, 1977. The Revenue moved the Tribunal for a reference under section 256(1); the Tribunal referred the question to this Court.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to interest under section 244 on the amount of interest (Rs. 1,90,499) payable under section 214 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961?

Arguments of the Parties

Revenue's Arguments

  • The Tribunal's conclusion effectively grants interest on interest, which the Revenue contends is not permissible under the statute.
  • Section 237 defines "refund" and, according to the Revenue, only the amount of tax paid in excess is refundable; amounts payable under section 214 (interest by Government) are not within the scope of refund under section 237 for the purposes of section 244.
  • Thus, the Revenue submitted that interest under section 244 could not be allowed on the interest amount awarded under section 214.

Assessee's Arguments

  • The statutory language of section 244 is clear and entitles the assessee to interest where a refund becomes due under an order referred to in section 240 and is not granted within the stipulated time.
  • The Rs. 1,90,499 was allowed to the assessee by an appellate order (an order under section 240) and therefore qualifies as an amount that became due to the assessee under section 240; accordingly section 244 applies.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
D.J. Works v. Deputy CIT, [1992] 195 ITR 227 (Gujarat High Court) Noted as taking a similar view on the applicability of section 244 to amounts made payable by an appellate order under section 240. The Court observed that a similar view had been taken in this case and referenced it in support of the interpretation that section 244 applies to "any amount" which becomes due under section 240.
Chiman Lal S. Patel v. CIT, [1994] 210 ITR 419 Noted in the opinion; referenced in relation to the interpretative issue (the citation indicates related discussion though the opinion notes differing conclusions in that authority). The Court recorded that this case was among authorities considered; it indicated that the case had been taken into account though it reached a different conclusion in its own context.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court's analysis proceeded from a textual reading of the relevant statutory provisions—sections 214, 237, 240 and 244 of the Income-Tax Act as they stood at the relevant time. The pivotal statutory language examined was:

  • Section 240: prescribes that where, as a result of any order passed in appeal or other proceedings under the Act, refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee, the Assessing Officer shall refund the amount without the assessee having to claim it.
  • Section 244: prescribes that where a refund is due to the assessee in pursuance of an order referred to in section 240 and the Assessing Officer does not grant the refund within three months from the end of the month in which the order is passed, the Central Government shall pay simple interest at the statutory rate on the amount of refund due from the date following the expiry of the three-month period until payment is made.

The Court emphasized the crucial expressions in section 240 — "any amount which becomes due to the assessee as a result of any order passed in any appeal or other proceedings under the Act" and the phrase "amount becomes due to the assessee." The Court held that a combined reading of sections 240 and 244 demonstrates that the entitlement to interest under section 244 is triggered by the fact that "any amount" becomes due under an order referred to in section 240; the provisions are not limited to a refund solely of the tax component.

Applying these provisions to the undisputed facts, the Court noted that the sum of Rs. 1,90,499 was allowed to the assessee by an appellate order (i.e., an order under section 240) as interest under section 214. Because that sum became payable to the assessee by virtue of the appellate order and the Assessing Officer failed to make the refund within the statutory period, the statutory requirement for payment of interest under section 244 was satisfied. The fact that the amount allowed by the appellate order represented interest payable under section 214 did not alter its character as "any amount" becoming due under section 240.

The Court also noted (quoting the Tribunal) that the Tribunal awarded interest for the period from November 1, 1976 to April 21, 1977. The Court accepted the legal conclusion that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 244 on the Rs. 1,90,499 that had been allowed by the appellate order.

Holding and Implications

Holding:

The question referred was answered in the affirmative: the assessee is entitled to interest under section 244 on the amount of Rs. 1,90,499 which had been allowed by the appellate order under section 240.

Implications:

  • Direct effect on the parties: The Court ruled in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal's view that section 244 applies to "any amount" that becomes due under an order referred to in section 240, including an amount comprised of interest allowed under section 214; consequently the assessee was entitled to interest on the Rs. 1,90,499 for the period the Tribunal specified.
  • Broader implications: The opinion rests on a textual interpretation that section 244 applies to "any amount" which becomes due under section 240. The Court cited earlier authorities (including D.J. Works and Chiman Lal S. Patel) in the course of its reasoning. The opinion itself does not elaborate broader new principles beyond this interpretive conclusion; its direct effect is to resolve the referred question in favour of the assessee on the stated facts.

This summary is confined to the statements and materials contained in the provided opinion. No information outside the text of the opinion has been added.

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Goodyear India Ltd.

    Arijit Pasayat, C.J:— At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred for the opinion of this court by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short, the “Tribunal”), under section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”)

    “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the assessee is entitled to interest under section 244 on the amount of interest, amounting to Rs. 1,90,499 payable under section 214 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961?”

    2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1967-68.

    3. The factual position which is almost undisputed is essentially as follows:

    The assessee had paid advance tax of Rs. 8,08,667 for the concerned assessment year. However, on assessment the total demand raised by the order of assessment dated March 6, 1972, was Rs. 9,65,331. While raising the demand, the Income-Tax Officer had not given credit for the tax paid and had also not allowed certain other reliefs. The assessee filed an application for rectification on April 10, 1972. The Income-Tax Officer passed an order on October 10, 1972, by which he held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,72,726. He did not grant this refund in cash but adjusted it against the demand for the assessment year 1968-69. The assessee claimed interest on the advance tax paid by it under section 214 of the Act. This was partly denied by the Income-Tax Officer vide his order dated August 16, 1974. The assessee went in appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (in short “the AAC”). By order dated July 14, 1976, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner directed the Income-Tax Officer to allow interest up to October 10, 1972. This worked out to Rs. 1,90,499, calculated for the period from April 1, 1967, to September 30, 1972. Technically, interest was calculated up to October 10, 1972, but since no interest was payable for part of the month, it was calculated only upto September 30, 1972. Refund of the above interest was granted on April 21, 1977. The assessee therefore claimed that it should be granted further interest on the amount of Rs. 1,90,499 itself. The claim was made under section 244 of the Act. This was rejected by the Income-Tax Officer vide order dated November 2, 1977, on the ground that there was no provision in the Act for granting interest on interest payable under section 214 of the Act. His order was affirmed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) (in short, the CIT (A)) vide order dated September 7, 1978. The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) held that the amount of interest paid to the assessee could not be said to be a refund in terms of section 237 of the Act and therefore the assessee was not entitled to any interest under section 244 of the Act, as claimed. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee's stand was that interest of Rs. 1,90,499 was allowed to it as per the appellate order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner dated July 14, 1976, and was therefore a refund falling under section 240 of the Act. The said provision laid down that where, as a result of any appeal or any other proceeding under the Act refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee, the Income-Tax Officer shall, except as otherwise provided in the Act, refund the amount to the assessee without his having to make any claim in that behalf. Reference was also made to section 244(1) of the Act, which provided that where a refund is due to the assessee in pursuance of an order referred to under section 240 and the Income-Tax Officer does not grant the refund within a period of three months from the end of the month in which the order is passed, the Central Government shall pay simple interest at the stipulated rate per annum on the amount of refund due from the date immediately following the expiry of the date on which the refund is granted.

    4. The stand of the Revenue was that there was no question of granting interest on interest payable under section 240. With reference to section 237 it was submitted that the said provision clearly lays down that if any person satisfies the Income-Tax Officer that the amount of tax paid by him for any assessment year exceeds the amount which is properly chargeable under the Act for that year, he shall be entitled to the refund of the excess. In a sense it was submitted that such a refund of the amount paid by the assessee or on its behalf under section 240 as well as section 244 are relatable to such amount only and not to any interest payable under section 214 of the Act.

    5. The Tribunal did not accept the Revenue's stand and held that since the amount of Rs. 1,90,499 became refundable as a result of the appellate order which falls under section 240 of the Act, the assessee is clearly entitled to interest on that amount under section 244 of the Act, as the Income-Tax Officer failed to grant refund within the stipulated period. It was held that the assessee was entitled to interest only for the period from November 1, 1976, to April 21, 1977.

    6. On being moved for a reference, the question as set out above has been referred for the opinion of this court.

    7. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is the stand of learned counsel for the Revenue that in essence the Tribunal's order means grant of interest on interest which is not permissible under the statute. It is further his case that section 237 of the Act defines what is refund and therefore the assessee is not entitled to any sum which is not covered by section 237. Elaborating, he stated that it was the amount of advance tax which was paid in excess which is to be refunded and the question of any interest being allowed under section 244 does not arise. Learned counsel for the assessee, on the other hand, submitted that the language of the statute is very clear and the provision of section 244 makes the position clear that the assessee is entitled to interest.

    8. In order to appreciate the rival submissions, it is necessary to take note of the provisions i.e, sections 214, 237, 240 and 244 at the relevant time, which read as follows.

    “214. Interest payable by Government— (1) The Central Government shall pay simple interest at fifteen per cent, per annum on the amount by which the aggregate sum of any instalments of advance tax paid during any financial year in which they are payable under sections 207 to 213 exceeds the amount of the assessed tax, from the 1st day of April next following the said financial year to the date, of the regular assessment for the assessment year immediately following the said financial year, and where any such instalment is paid after the expiry of the financial year, during which it is payable by reason of the provisions of section 213, interest as aforesaid shall also be payable on that instalment from the date of its payment to the date of regular assessment:

    Provided that in respect of any amount refunded on a provisional assessment under section 141A, no interest shall be paid for any period after the date of such provisional assessment.

    237. Refunds— If any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under this Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess.

    240. Refund on appeal, etc.— Where, as a result of any order passed in appeal or other proceeding under this Act, refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee, the Assessing Officer shall, except as otherwise provided in this Act, refund the amount to the assessee without his having to make any claim in that behalf:

    Provided that where, by the order aforesaid,—

    (a) an assessment is set aside or cancelled and an order of fresh assessment is directed to be made, the refund, if any, shall become due only on the making of such fresh assessment;

    (b) the assessment is annulled, the refund shall become due only of the amount, if any, of the tax paid-in excess of the tax chargeable on the total income returned by the assessee.

    244. Interest on refund where no claim is needed—(1) Where a refund is due to the assessee in pursuance of an order referred to in section 240 and the Assessing Officer does not grant the refund within a period of three months from the end of the month in which such order is passed, the Central Government shall pay to the assessee simple interest at fifteen per cent, per annum on the amount of refund due from the date immediately following the expiry of the period of three months aforesaid to the date on which the refund is granted.

    (1A) Where the whole or any part of the refund referred to in sub-section (1) is due to the assessee, as a result of any amount having been paid by him after the 31st day of March, 1975, in pursuance of any order of assessment or penalty and such amount or any part thereof having been found in appeal or other proceeding under this Act to be in excess of the amount which such assessee is liable to pay as tax or penalty, as the case may be, under this Act, the Central Government shall pay to such assessee simple interest at the rate specified in sub-section (1) on the amount so found to be in excess from the date on which such amount was paid to the date on which the refund is granted:

    Provided that, where the amount so found to be in excess was paid in instalments, such interest shall be payable on the amount of each such instalment or any part of such instalment, which was in excess, from the date on which such instalment was paid to the date on which the refund is granted:

    Provided further that no interest under this sub-section shall be payable for a period of one month from the date of the passing of the order in appeal or other proceeding:

    Provided also that where any interest is payable to an assessee under this sub-section, no interest under sub-section (1) shall be payable to him in respect of the amount so found to be in excess.

    (2) Where a refund is withheld under the provisions of section 241, the Central Government shall pay interest at the aforesaid rate on the amount of refund ultimately determined to be due as a result of the appeal or further proceeding for the period commencing after the expiry of three months from the end of the month in which the order referred to in section 241 is passed to the date the refund is granted.

    (3) The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1989, or any subsequent assessment years.”

    9. Section 244 deals with interest on refund where no claim is needed. Sub-section (2), inter alia, provides that where a refund is due to the assessee, “in pursuance of an order referred to in section 240” and the Assessing Officer does not grant the refund within the stipulated time, the Central Government is required to pay simple interest at the stipulated rate. Section 240 deals with refund on appeal, etc. This provision clearly lays down that where as a result of any order passed in appeal or other proceedings under this Act, refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee, the Assessing Officer shall, except as otherwise provided in this Act, refund the amount to the assessee without his having to make any claim in that behalf. The crucial expressions in section 240 are “any amount which becomes due to the assessee as a result of any order passed in any appeal or other proceedings under the Act” and the “amount becomes due to the assessee”. Section 244 refers to the liability fastened on the Central Government in case of failure to grant refund within the stipulated time in a case where refund is due to the assessee in pursuance of an order referred to in section 240. A combined reading of both the provisions makes the position crystal clear that it is any amount which becomes due to the assessee and not necessarily the tax component. Undisputedly, a sum of Rs. 1,90,499 which qualifies for interest became payable to the assessee on the basis of an order passed under section 240 of the Act. Merely because this was inclusive of an amount which was payable under section 214 of the Act, that would not make the position any different. It is an amount which became due to the assessee on the basis of the appellate order. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to interest in terms of section 244 of the Act. A similar view has been taken by the Gujarat High Court in D.J Works v. Deputy CIT, [1992] 195 ITR 227 and Chiman Lal S. Patel v. CIT, [1994] 210 ITR 419 though with different conclusions. Above being the position, we answer the question in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Goodyear India Ltd.
    (Feb 19, 2001)