Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bishal Enterprises

    Mrs. A. Subbulakshmy, J.:— At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to us for consideration:

    “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the activities carried out for the preparation of granite blocks amounted to manufacture of an article within the meaning of section 32A and the assessee is entitled for investment allowance under section 32A?”

    2. The year of assessment involved is 1984-85.

    3. The assessee is a registered firm. It was engaged in the business of mining granite blocks and exporting the same.

    4. The assessee claimed investment allowance which was negatived by the Income-Tax Officer. On appeal the Commissioner of Income-Tax allowed the assessee's claim and the Tribunal also confirmed the order of the-Commissioner of Income-Tax. On that this reference has arisen.

    5. A similar, question was considered by this court in Tax Cases Nos. 810 and 811 of 1989 and this court by its order dated October 27, 1998 (Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Gomatesh Granites, [2000] 246 ITR 737), has answered this question against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Following the above decision and for the reasons stated therein, we answer the question referred to us, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bishal Enterprises
    (Dec 1, 1998)