Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Sankakalingam v. State

    This is a reference by the District Magistrate under the following circumstances. A case has been filed against one Sankaralingam for the offence of murder. The case was enquired into by the sub Magistrate, Triunelveli. The accused is said to be deaf and dumb, and according to the committal order, with the assistance of P.W 14, a teacher in the Deaf and Dumb School, Palayamcottai, the proceedings were interpreted to the accused, and the accused appeared to understand the proceedings as interpreted by P.W 14. As there was a prima facie case, the Sub Magistrate committed the accused to take his trial before the Sessions Judge, for the offence of murder. Under S. 341, Crl. P.C a Sub-Magistrate can submit the proceedings after commitment only if the accused, though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings. But once he has comimtted, the Sessions Judge has seision of the case, and it is not open to him to write to the District Magistrate to ask the Sub-Magistrate to refer the matter to the high Court, particularly in view of the fact that so far as the Sub-Magistrate was concerned he was of the opinion that the accused could be made to understand the proceedings and has understood the proceedings through the interpretatation of P.W 14. In any event under S. 341 Crl. P.C the District Magistrate has no jurisdiction to refer the case, which is pending trial before the Sessions Judge. After it is committed by the Sub-Magistrate after being satisfied that the accused can understand the proceedings, it is only the Sessions Judge, who has seisin of the case, that has to submit the proceedings in accordance with the provisions of S. 341, Cr.P.C The District Magistrate has no jurisdiction to refer this matter. This reference is therefore returned and the Sessions Judge will dispose of the case in accordance with the provisions of S. 341 Cr.P.C

    N.T.R

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Sankakalingam v. State
    (Mar 7, 1956)