AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act,
  • Section 5(2)(a), entry 66(a)
  • Section 5(2)(b)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act,
  • Section 5(2)(a), entry 66(a)
  • Section 5(2)(b)
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The petitioners are dealers in foodgrains, specifically powa, muramura, and pelalu (beaten, parched, and puffed rice), operating under a valid license issued under the Andhra Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1964. They purchase paddy and manufacture these products. Tax was paid on the purchase of paddy at the point of first purchase under Section 5(2)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. The Government of Andhra Pradesh withdrew a prior exemption on sales tax for these products by G.O. Ms. No. 208 Rev. (S) dated 21st March 1973, following which a notice was issued demanding payment of sales tax at 3½ per cent on sales from 1st April 1973. The petitioners contested this demand unsuccessfully and filed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent the respondents from collecting sales tax on the sale of powa, muramura, and pelalu.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether sales tax on the sale of powa, muramura, and pelalu is leviable under Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act or under Section 5(2)(b) read with item 66(b) of the First Schedule of the Act.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, particularly Section 5(1) and Section 5(2) with reference to the First and Second Schedules. Section 5(1) imposes tax on turnover generally, while Section 5(2) provides for tax to be levied either at the point of sale or purchase for goods listed in the First and Second Schedules, respectively. The court noted that paddy is taxed at the point of first purchase under Section 5(2)(b) and that rice obtained from paddy that has already met tax under the Act is taxable at a reduced rate under item 66(b) of the First Schedule. The government had earlier exempted powa, muramura, and pelalu from sales tax, presumably because these are products of paddy obtained without chemical processing. The court concluded that these products are indeed derived from paddy and therefore fall under item 66(b), making them taxable only under Section 5(2)(b) and not liable to multipoint tax under Section 5(1). Thus, sales tax can be levied on these products only in accordance with item 66(b) of the First Schedule, depending on whether tax on paddy has already been paid at purchase.

Holding and Implications

The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to levy and collect sales tax on the petitioners for the sale of powa, muramura, and pelalu only in accordance with entry 66(a) or 66(b) of the First Schedule, depending on whether tax at the purchase point of paddy has been paid under Section 5(2)(b) of the Act. The writ petition was allowed to this extent, with no order as to costs except an advocate's fee of Rs. 100.

Holding: The sales tax on powa, muramura, and pelalu is leviable under Section 5(2)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act as products of paddy, and not under Section 5(1), thereby preventing multipoint taxation.

Implications: The decision restricts the levy of sales tax on these products to a single point as specified in the statute, ensuring that tax is not imposed multiple times on the same goods. No new precedent beyond this case-specific ruling was established.

    Alladi Venkateswarlu And Others v. Government Of A.P And Another

    1. The short but interesting question that arises in this writ petition is: Whether sales tax on the sale of powa, muramura and pelalu is leviable under Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act, or under Section 5(2)(b) read with item 66(b) of the First Schedule of the Act.

    2. The facts are neither disputed nor complicated: The petitioners are dealers in foodgrains particularly dealing in powa, muramura and pelalu (beaten, parched and puffed rice) under a valid and subsisting licence issued under the Andhra Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1964.

    3. The petitioners purchase paddy and manufacture powa, muramura and pelalu. Tax is paid on the purchase of paddy at the point of first purchase in accordance with Section 5(2)(b) read with entry 8 of the Second Schedule of the Act. It appears, the Government of Andhra Pradesh through G.O. Ms. No. 208 Rev. (S) dated 21st March, 1973, withdrew the exemption given earlier in G.O. Ms. No. 2197 dated 19th December, 1961, exempting the collection of any sales tax on powa, muramura and pelalu. Consequently, notice dated 23rd November, 1973, was issued by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Janagam, to all the dealers in powa, muramura and pelalu including the petitioners demanding payment of sales tax immediately at the rate of 3½ per cent for the sales effected from 1st April, 1973. The petitioners represented, but in vain to the authorities, that they were not liable to pay any sales tax on the sale of powa, muramura and pelalu. They have now filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus interdicting the respondents, viz., the State Government and the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Janagam, from collecting any sales tax from the petitioners on the sales of powa, muramura and pelalu.

    4. The only question debated before me was: Whether sales tax could be levid, on the facts and circumstances of the case, under Section 5(1) of the Act or under section 5(2) read with entry 66(b) of the First Schedule of the Act. It is, therefore, necessary to read the relevant provisions:

    5. Levy of tax on sales or purchases of goods.--(1) Every dealer (other than a casual trader and an agent of a non-resident dealer) whose total turnover for a year is not less than Rs. 15,000 and every agent of a nonresident dealer, whatever be his turnover for the year, shall pay a tax for each year at the rate of three paise on every rupee of his turnover. Every casual trader shall pay a tax at the rate of three paise on every rupee of his turnover:

    Provided that if and to the extent to which such turnover relates to articles of food or drink or both sold in a hotel, boarding house, restaurant, stall or any other place for consumption on the premises and if the total turnover relating to these articles is not less than Rs. 40,000 for the year, the tax shall be calculated at the rate of three paise in the rupee, on the first Rs. 39,999 and at the rate of four paise in the rupee on the balance of the turnover.

    (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-section (1), the tax under this Act shall be levied--

    (a) in the case of the goods mentioned in the First Schedule at the rates and only at the point of the sale specified as applicable thereto, effected in the State by the dealer selling them, on his turnover of sales in each year relating to such goods irrespective of the quantum of turnover;

    (b) in the case of the goods mentioned in the Second Schedule, at the rates and only at the point of the purchase specified as applicable thereto, effected in the State by the dealer purchasing them, on his turnover of purchase in each year relating to such goods irrespective of the quantum of turnover.

    (3) ...

    (4) The taxes under this section shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner, as may be prescribed:

    Provided that--

    (i) in respect of the same transaction, the buyer or the seller, but not both, as determined by such rules as may be prescribed shall be taxed;

    (ii) where a dealer has been taxed in respect of the purchase of any goods in accordance with the rules referred to in Clause (i) of this proviso, he shall not be taxed again in respect of any sale of such goods effected by him."

    5. Under the Second Schedule of Section 5(2)(b) of the Act under entry 8, 5 paise in the rupee is the rate of tax fixed on paddy at the point of first purchase in the State. Under the First Schedule to Section 5(2)(a), entry 66(a) provides that rice not covered by sub-item (b) is taxable at the rate of 6 paise in the rupee at the point of sale by the first wholesale dealer in the State effecting sale, provided that a rebate of 2 paise in the rupee shall be allowed on the rice sold and consumed in the State in accordance with such rules as may be prescribed. Sub-item (b) stipulates that rice obtained from paddy that has met tax under the Act is taxable at the rate of 1 paisa in the rupee at the point of sale by the first wholesale dealer in the State effecting the sale. The question, therefore, is whether powa, muramura and pelalu are also products obtained from paddy and are liable only to tax under item 66(b). It is also evident that the Government under the G.O. Ms. No. 2197 Rev. dated 19th December, 1961, had totally exempted collection of any sales tax on the sale of powa, muramura and pelalu. Apparently they are considered as products of paddy obtained without undergoing any chemical process. I do not, therefore, think that any tax can be levied under Section 5(1) of the Act thereby permitting multipoint tax. However, as I have said that they are products of paddy they fall under item 66(b) and, therefore, sales tax can be levied on the sale of these goods, viz., powa, muramura and pelalu as provided under entry 66(b) of the First Schedule. A mandamus shall, therefore, issue to the respondents to levy and collect sales tax on the petitioners on the sale of powa, muramura and pelalu in accordance with entry 66(a) or (b), as the case may be, depending on the condition that tax at the purchase point of paddy has already been paid or not under Section 5(2)(b) of the Act. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. No costs. Advocate's fee Rs. 100.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Alladi Venkateswarlu And Others v. Government Of A.P And Another
    (Nov 4, 1975)