Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Hari Fertilisers v. Union Of India And Others

    B.N Sapru, J.:— This writ petition has been filed against the order of the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals). Four appeals are pen ding against the orders of the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Varanasi in which stay applications were filed. The Collector rejected all the stay applications except one which has been allowed in part. Under the proviso to Section 35F, the appellate authority may grant stay if the demand levied would cause undue hardship to the person appealing. The Collector should pass a speaking order taking into account this aspect of the matter. He may also consider whether any part of the demand is prima facie barred by time before passing appropriate orders. With these observation the writ petition is dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Hari Fertilisers v. Union Of India And Others
    (Jul 25, 1985)