Orkney Marine Farms Ltd v Lord Advocate and Scottish Ministers [2021] CSOH 112: Reinforcing the Precautionary Principle in Marine Environmental Regulation
Introduction
The case of Orkney Marine Farms Ltd v Lord Advocate and Scottish Ministers ([2021] CSOH 112) was adjudicated in the Outer House of the Scottish Court of Session on October 29, 2021. Orkney Marine Farms Ltd sought judicial review after the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and subsequently the Scottish Ministers denied their applications to discharge effluent and solid waste from two proposed salmon farms—Yinstay East and Yinstay West—located off the coast of Orkney Mainland in Shapinsay Sound.
The primary contention revolved around the potential environmental impact of the discharge, specifically concerning maerl beds, which are vital marine habitats comprising various species of slow-growing seaweed. The petitioners argued that the decision-makers had misapplied relevant regulations and failed to adequately consider the health of existing maerl beds.
Summary of the Judgment
The court upheld the decisions of the Scottish Ministers, dismissing Orkney Marine's petition for judicial review. The key issues examined included:
- The application of the precautionary principle under Policy GEN 19 of the National Marine Plan (NMP) in assessing potential damage to maerl beds.
- The appropriateness of the proposed relocation of the fish farms as a mitigation measure.
- The consideration of climate change impacts in the decision-making process.
Lady Carmichael, delivering the opinion, concluded that the reporters had not acted unlawfully or irrationally. The decision emphasized the high degree of uncertainty regarding the environmental impact of the effluents and justified the application of precautionary measures to protect the maerl beds. Consequently, the petition was refused, reinforcing the authority of regulatory bodies in environmental protection matters.
Analysis
Precedents Cited
The judgment extensively referenced the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, particularly Section 15, which mandates public authorities to adhere to the appropriate marine plans when making authorization or enforcement decisions affecting the Scottish marine area. Additionally, it cited the policies within the National Marine Plan (NMP), especially GEN 5 (Climate Change), GEN 9 (Natural Heritage), and GEN 19 (Precautionary Principle), which collectively guide sustainable marine development and environmental protection.
Legal Reasoning
The court's reasoning hinged on the correct application of the precautionary principle as embodied in Policy GEN 19. Given the significant uncertainties surrounding the environmental impact of the proposed discharges on maerl beds, the reporters—as representatives of SEPA and the Scottish Ministers—appropriately exercised caution by denying the authorizations. The judges underscored that maerl beds are a priority marine feature with substantial importance for biodiversity and carbon sequestration.
Furthermore, the court addressed the petitioners' argument regarding the health of the maerl beds. It affirmed that even areas with compromised maerl still contribute to the overall ecosystem's resilience and that the potential for long-term damage warranted precautionary measures.
Regarding the proposed relocation of the fish farms, the court found that it was within the reporters' rights to evaluate such mitigation measures and determine their sufficiency in reducing environmental risks, thereby rejecting the argument that the relocation was inadequately considered.
Impact
This judgment reinforces the robustness of the precautionary principle in Scottish environmental law, particularly in marine contexts. It sets a precedent that environmental uncertainties necessitate cautious regulatory approaches to protect vital ecosystems. Future developers and environmental bodies will reference this case to understand the judiciary's stance on applying precaution in the face of environmental uncertainties.
Moreover, the decision underscores the importance of comprehensive environmental assessments and the judiciary's deference to specialized regulatory bodies' expertise in such matters.
Complex Concepts Simplified
Maerl Beds
Maerl beds are underwater structures formed by the growth of various species of maerl, a type of slow-growing, calcareous seaweed. These beds are crucial for marine biodiversity, providing habitat for numerous species and playing a role in carbon sequestration.
Precautionary Principle
A fundamental approach in environmental law that advocates for preventive action in the face of uncertainty. If there's potential for significant harm to the environment, the burden of proof falls on those proposing the activity to demonstrate its safety.
Judicial Review
A legal process where courts examine the lawfulness of decisions or actions made by public bodies, ensuring they comply with statutory and common law obligations.
Conclusion
The refusal of Orkney Marine Farms' applications by the Scottish Ministers, as upheld by the Court of Session, underscores the judiciary's support for stringent environmental protections, especially when scientific uncertainties prevail. By adhering to the precautionary principle, the decision ensures that vital marine habitats like maerl beds receive the necessary safeguarding against potential detrimental activities.
This judgment serves as a crucial reference for future cases involving environmental regulation and marine development, highlighting the balance between economic interests and ecological preservation. It emphasizes that in matters of environmental significance, particularly those impacting biodiversity and climate change, precaution and thorough assessment are paramount.
Comments