National Green Tribunal Establishes Enhanced Compliance Requirements for Environmental Clearances in Forest Land Diversions
Introduction
In the landmark case of The Conservation Action Trust v. Union of India, adjudicated by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) Southern Zone in Chennai on September 30, 2022, the Tribunal addressed significant environmental concerns related to the diversion of reserved forest land for non-forest purposes. The appellants, comprising a public charitable trust and an environmentally focused organization, challenged the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted by the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEF&CC) to the Telangana State Power Development Corporation Limited for the establishment of a massive coal-based Thermal Power Station (Yadadri TPS) in Telangana.
The core issues revolved around the ecological impact of the proposed project, adherence to environmental guidelines, the integrity of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and the adequacy of public consultation mechanisms.
Summary of the Judgment
The NGT, upon thorough examination of the submissions from both appellants and respondents, found merit in the concerns raised by the appellants regarding the diversion of a substantial portion of reserved forest land for a coal-fired thermal power plant. The Tribunal concluded that the Environmental Clearance granted was partially flawed and thus needed to be set aside.
Key decisions included:
- Suspension of the EC granted to the project proponent until further appraisal studies are conducted.
- Issuance of directives to the MoEF&CC and State Government to adhere strictly to environmental guidelines when considering the diversion of forest land.
- Mandating additional Terms of Reference (ToR) for conducting further studies on coal linkage, radioactivity impact, ambient air quality, and ecological effects.
- Ensuring the protection of nearby ecologically sensitive zones, especially the Amrabad Tiger Reserve.
Analysis
Precedents Cited
The Tribunal referred to several key precedents to substantiate its decision, including:
- Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India - Emphasizing the necessity of eco-sensitive zones and stringent environmental assessments.
- Samata Vs. Union of India & Ors. - Highlighting the importance of proper public hearing processes.
- Uma Maheshwar Dahagama Vs. Union of India & Ors. - Underlining the application of the precautionary principle in environmental clearances.
These cases collectively reinforced the Tribunal’s stance on the critical evaluation of environmental clearances, especially concerning forest land diversion and the need for comprehensive impact assessments.
Legal Reasoning
The Tribunal meticulously analyzed the procedural lapses and substantive deficiencies in the clearance process:
- Non-Adherence to Siting Guidelines: The EC was granted without fully complying with the Central Electricity Authority's siting criteria, which prioritize non-forest and non-agricultural lands for thermal projects.
- Inadequate Public Consultation: The substitution of physical public hearings with online comment submissions was contrary to the EIA Notification, 2006, undermining genuine public participation.
- Flawed EIA Process: The initial EIA report was found to be plagiarized and lacked credible baseline data, necessitating a revised assessment.
- Ecological Impact Oversights: Critical impacts on the Tungapahad Vagu and the proximity to the Amrabad Tiger Reserve were insufficiently addressed.
The Tribunal applied the Precautionary Principle, asserting that in the face of uncertainty and potential significant environmental harm, the burden of proof lies on the proponent to demonstrate the absence of adverse effects.
Impact
The judgment has far-reaching implications for future environmental clearances and forest land diversions in India:
- Stricter Compliance: Authorities are mandated to adhere rigorously to environmental guidelines, ensuring that land diversion for industrial projects is justified and minimally impactful.
- Enhanced Public Participation: Genuine public hearings are now reinforced as a non-negotiable aspect of the EIA process, safeguarding community interests.
- Broadened Accountability: The Tribunal’s directions to the MoEF&CC and State Governments set a precedent for higher scrutiny and accountability in environmental governance.
- Encouragement of Sustainable Development: Balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability is emphasized, aligning with global commitments to combat climate change.
This judgment serves as a crucial check on unchecked industrial expansion, ensuring that environmental sanctity is preserved in tandem with developmental aspirations.
Complex Concepts Simplified
Environmental Clearance (EC)
EC is a permit granted by the government to undertake projects that might have significant environmental impacts. It ensures that the project adheres to environmental regulations and guidelines.
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
This act aims to regulate the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes. It mandates that the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change must approve any such diversion, ensuring minimal ecological disruption.
Precautionary Principle
This principle dictates that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus, the burden of proof falls on those advocating for the action.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
EIA is a process used to evaluate the environmental effects of a proposed project or development. It ensures that decision-makers consider environmental impacts before proceeding with projects.
Conclusion
The NGT’s judgment in The Conservation Action Trust v. Union of India underscores the judiciary’s pivotal role in safeguarding environmental integrity against unchecked industrial expansions. By mandating enhanced compliance, rigorous impact assessments, and genuine public participation, the Tribunal has fortified the framework governing environmental clearances.
This decision not only reinforces existing environmental laws but also sets a higher benchmark for future projects, ensuring that development does not come at the cost of ecological degradation. The emphasis on the Precautionary Principle and stringent adherence to siting guidelines heralds a more sustainable approach to industrial growth, aligning with both national interests and global environmental commitments.
Stakeholders, including government bodies, project proponents, and civil society, must heed this judgment as a clarion call to prioritize environmental stewardship in the pursuit of economic development.
Comments