Condoning Procedural Delays in Renewable Energy Certificate Issuance: India Glycols Limited v. NLDC

Condoning Procedural Delays in Renewable Energy Certificate Issuance: India Glycols Limited v. National Load Despatch Centre (NLDC)

Introduction

The case of India Glycols Limited v. National Load Despatch Centre (NLDC) was adjudicated by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) on January 24, 2021. The petition was filed by India Glycols Limited, a company engaged in generating electricity through its 12 MW bio-mass-based renewable energy cogeneration facility in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. The core issue revolved around the petitioner’s request to condone a three-day delay in submitting an application for the issuance of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) for energy injected in February 2018.

Summary of the Judgment

India Glycols Limited sought the CERC's intervention to condone a procedural delay in filing an application for RECs, which was rejected by NLDC due to non-compliance with the timelines specified under the REC Regulations, 2010. The petitioner argued that the delay was caused by the late receipt of the verified Energy Injection Report (EIR) from UPSLDC and subsequent non-working days. The CERC, after reviewing the submissions, concluded that the delay was beyond the petitioner’s control and thus condoned the three-day delay, directing NLDC to issue the RECs after due verification.

Analysis

Precedents Cited

In this judgment, the CERC primarily relied on the existing REC Regulations, 2010, and specifically the procedural requirements outlined therein. No direct case law precedents were cited; however, the Commission's interpretation aligns with the regulatory intent to promote renewable energy by providing flexibility in procedural adherence under exceptional circumstances.

Legal Reasoning

The CERC examined the procedural lapse as a mere three-day delay, attributing it to factors beyond the petitioner’s control—specifically, the delay in receiving the EIR from UPSLDC and the occurrence of non-working days immediately after. Recognizing the petitioner’s commitment to renewable energy generation and the broader legislative intent to promote such initiatives, the Commission deemed the circumstances warranting condonation. The legal reasoning hinged on balancing strict regulatory compliance with fairness and the overarching goal of fostering renewable energy projects.

Impact

This judgment sets a significant precedent for renewable energy generators by illustrating the regulatory body's willingness to accommodate minor procedural delays under justified circumstances. It underscores the importance of supporting renewable energy initiatives by ensuring that procedural technicalities do not hinder the issuance of RECs, thereby facilitating smoother operations for renewable energy entities. Future cases involving procedural delays may reference this judgment to argue for similar condonations, potentially leading to more flexible regulatory practices in the renewable energy sector.

Complex Concepts Simplified

  • Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs): These are market-based instruments that certify the bearer owns one megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity generated from a renewable energy source.
  • Energy Injection Report (EIR): A document that records the amount of electricity generated and injected into the grid by a renewable energy source.
  • Condonation of Delay: A legal term meaning the acceptance or forgiveness of a delay in fulfilling a procedural requirement.
  • REC Regulations, 2010: The set of rules established by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission governing the issuance and management of Renewable Energy Certificates in India.

Conclusion

The CERC's decision in India Glycols Limited v. NLDC marks a pivotal moment in the administration of Renewable Energy Certificates. By condoning a minor procedural delay stemming from factors beyond the petitioner’s control, the Commission reinforced its commitment to supporting renewable energy initiatives. This judgment not only offers relief to entities facing similar challenges but also emphasizes the necessity of regulatory frameworks that balance strict compliance with practical flexibility. As renewable energy continues to play a crucial role in India's energy landscape, such judicial interpretations will be instrumental in ensuring the sector's sustainable growth and operational efficiency.

Case Details

Year: 2021
Court: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Judge(s)

P.K. PujariChairpersonI.S. Jha, MemberArun Goyal, Member

Advocates

Shri Matrugupta Mishra, Advocate, IGLShri Samyak Mishra, Advocate, IGLShri Sailesh Chand, IGLShri Niraj Kumar, IGLShri Kailash Chand Saini, NLDCShri Alok Kumar Mishra, NLDC

Comments